Some related articles :
|
RMT threatens
pensions strike
By
Sarah Toyne
BBC
News, September 5, 2002
Workers
at the Caparo steel plant at Tredegar The
powerful rail workers union, the RMT, has told BBC News Online that its
workers could strike over the closure of final salary pension schemes. It
is the latest union to voice increasing dissatisfaction with the current
scale of closures of the generous pension schemes - and threaten
industrial action. The
RMT's concerns for the Railways Pension scheme could take the pensions
issue onto a different level as while it is a relatively small union, it
is immensely powerful.
The
pensions issue will be hotly debated at next week's Trades Union Congress
(TUC) meeting in Blackpool. Caparo
Group, a steel company, owned by Labour peer Lord Paul is already facing
strike action from workers. RMT
concerns The
RMT - which represents 60,000 transport workers - is currently negotiating
with a number of companies, including Wightlink, an Isle of Wight car
ferry operator, Southern Vectis, an Isle of Wight bus company, and Wilts
& Dorset another bus company to try and prevent closures of the
schemes. Like
many other industries, the rail industry could be facing a pensions
crunch.
Bob
Crow: "Pensions is pay" Under
rules created when the rail industry was privatised in September 1993,
railway workers' pensions were afforded a degree of protection. A
cash reserve enabled workers at rail companies to pay reduced
contributions. This reserve is now set to run out in September next year. The
operating companies have just received new valuations of the pension funds
and will be able to assess whether there is a shortfall or not. "If
we find an employer has set up a money purchase scheme, we would be saying
to them we do not want you to do it. If they continued, we would be in
dispute," says Bob Crow, secretary general of the RMT. Unilateral
decisions In
an attempt at pre-empting disputes, the RMT is writing to employers and
inviting them to engage in negotiations with the union. "Every
single employer will need to examine their section of pension fund. "Action
will need to be taken for those that are in deficit. But we don't want an
employer's unilateral decision on how much contributions will go up by. We
want them to discuss it with us first," says Mr Crow. RMT
is not alone in voicing threats. Amicus,
which has 1.2m members, says some workers at a number of manufacturing
companies have already balloted for strike action. "Sometime
in the next month or so we should know," says Brian Harris, a
spokesman. GMB
is another union locked in negotiations with the aim of trying to prevent
scheme closures. It
says it is talking to about a dozen companies, who are planning to scrap
their final salary schemes, including British Airways. "We
won't rule out striking over pensions, but we are not at that point in any
of our discussions," says Emily Thomas.
"It
will absolutely become a strike issue if the trend continues. These
companies are seeing this as a cost-cutting measure," she added. In
the early 1990s, many employers - encouraged by strong market performance
- took an £18bn payment holiday. Unions say this is - in part - the
reason there are problems now. 'Betrayal
of the low paid'
At
next week's TUC conference the pensions issue has a prime-time billing. According
to Tom Powdrill, pensions investment officer at the TUC, members feel it
is the most important issue of the moment. "Pensions
are effectively deferred pay," says Mr Powdrill. "Therefore
when employers close final salary schemes or reduce the amount they
contribute, employees are taking a pay cut."
ISTC
is planning two-day strikes In
the autumn, the government will publish a green paper outlining its action
plan to tackle the mounting pensions crisis. But
it may not placate the unions and workers. Bob
Crow of the RMT said the closures are a betrayal of the low paid. FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Action on Aging distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|
|||||