|
SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | ||
|
By
Abigail Trafford, the
Last week at the joint meeting of the
American Society on Aging (ASA) and the National Council on the Aging, the
two faces stared at each other. Who represents the reality of aging today?
Who will dominate the country's aging agenda? Can there be two faces on
the same coin? The field of senior centers, nursing homes,
advocacy agencies and disease organizations is geared to the sad face. Its
purpose is to meet the needs of the sick and the frail, the isolated and
the disabled. And rightly so. When the Great Society programs of Medicare
and Medicaid were enacted in the 1960s, the elderly as a group were poor
and vulnerable. But over the last half-century, a social
revolution has occurred. Older Americans are now healthier, richer, better
educated and more active than ever before. Most people over 50 -- the age
of eligibility to join AARP -- do not fit the sad-face profile. "We need a different map" of
aging, said Ken Dychtwald, president of Age Wave in I refer to this new maturity as the bonus
decades of "My Time," an unprecedented period of vitality after
midlife but before old age. The emergence of this new vision reflects the
success of the aging movement to overcome poverty and manage illnesses of
the elderly. But will success spoil the aging movement? The dual face of late life is creating
tension within the ranks of the aging community. The program for this year's meeting is
mostly focused on the traditional image of aging, with papers entitled
"A Best-Practice Model for Dementia Care" and "Models for
Palliative Care in the Nursing Home Setting." Sometimes the sad-face
sessions are zipped up with catchy phrases, such as "You Are Not
Alone: Advocating for a Good Funeral," "What Do You Do When She
Won't Bathe, Dress or Sleep?" and "My Neighbor Is Poisoning Me:
Delusional Thought and Housing." Here and there, the other view of aging pops
up: "Transforming Boomers' Needs and Interests to Success in the
Marketplace." "Vitality in Aging." "Better Sex at Our
Age: Why Not?" But in the trenches of health care, it's
hard to see the smiley face of age. Over-stressed workers caring for
Alzheimer's patients aren't about to worry about boomers who want a
self-actualization program for unearthing some hidden potential. The problems of the sad-face minority are so
overwhelming that professionals in geriatrics don't have the time or
inclination to think about needs of the healthy. "When you're working
in the field, the problems present themselves with such extreme
intensity," explained Patrick Cullinane, director of special projects
on the ASA staff. "It really demands a lot of time and energy and
resources." But a total focus on the needy leaves out
the majority of people in this age zone. Where are the institutions to
support, train, educate and use this burgeoning population of healthy
elders? Instead of being only a problem, people in the bonus decades could
be an asset. Instead of a drain on taxpayer monies, a contributor. Rather
than taking resources away from younger generations, they could give back
to society in the form of community service, family stewardship, creative
works, new business. Programs that enhance the potential of older
Americans are preventive medicine. They keep people healthy and engaged in
work and relationships, shortening the period of frailty in late life. Yet
health promotion and management of chronic illness have long taken a back
seat in a health care system that focuses on crisis and acute care. "People in the field have been geared
to deal with the problems and the disabilities and less with the
potential. It's a maturity challenge for the field of geriatrics, as it is
for the society in general. We have to develop a more mature vision of
aging," said Cullinane. Otherwise, the sad face of aging will
persist. So will the social virus of ageism. Without opportunities,
retraining and support, generations of elders will likely fulfill the
stereotype of being old and useless. They will become a problem rather
than an asset. "We have to reframe this issue for the
public," said Patricia Polansky, assistant commissioner of the
Department of Health and Senior Services in In an era of shrinking budgets for domestic
programs, people in the aging field are dealing with cutbacks and trying
to continue needed services. There's little incentive to take on new
projects. But the aging movement now has a dual challenge: to give
services to the needy and opportunity to the able. Can it do both? As the two faces of aging collided at the
conference, leaders sought to bring them together. "We are all aging.
That's the one thing we have in common," continued Polansky. "We
need to prepare ourselves. There is this untapped resource. I think it's a
new world order." The meeting began with an opening ceremony
of drumming and dancing. Peter Podulke, 55, one of the dancers with the
Kairos Dance Theater, was dressed in white silk trousers and a teal tank
top, a large man with a gray-speckled beard who moved rhythmically to the
beat. A bricklayer, Podulke turned to dance five years ago. "It was a
liberating breakthrough for me," he said. The dance performance aimed to set the tone
for the meeting, which drew about 4,000 participants. As Podulke
explained: "It's a celebration of life. We are weaving together
stories of many people. We are creating community through dance." Creating community from disparate factions
in the field. Weaving together the stories of loss and joy, pain and
renewal, crisis and growth. Celebrating the two faces of aging. That's the hope, anyway.
|