Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 



How the Rest Was Won  

By Stan Hinden, the Washington Post

 
December 14, 2003  

Seven years into his retirement, Hinden can lean back and smile.  

All good things eventually come to an end. And that includes the Retirement Journal column, which I have been proud to write for the past seven years. It has been a unique journalistic experience and I would like to tell you how it began and what it's been like.  

In the spring of 1996, I walked into the office of David Ignatius, who was then The Post's business editor, and said I had decided to retire. I was 69 years old and had worked at The Post for 23 years, 12 of them in the Business section, writing two columns a week about stocks, bonds, mutual funds and the financial markets.  

My wife, Sara, I explained, had retired from General Electric Co. two years earlier and we wanted to have more time together. We had moved from a five-bedroom house, where we had raised our children, to a two-bedroom condo in a retirement community. It seemed like the right time to go.  

David said he understood, but then asked me a question I hadn't expected: Would I be willing to chronicle my experiences in a column about what it is like to retire? Pleasantly surprised, I agreed to write Retirement Journal -- even though I knew little about what I would face in retirement.  

Thus began the most unusual assignment of my nearly 50 years in journalism. Trained to be a "just the facts" reporter, I soon found myself in the uncommon and sometimes uncomfortable position of writing about myself, my finances, my health and my family.  

Some examples:  

When Sara and I were trying to decide whether to join a Medicare HMO -- a decision faced by millions of people -- I wrote about how HMOs work and why we chose to stay with Medicare rather than join an HMO and give up our regular doctors.  

When I turned 70 1/2, and was thus required by IRS rules to take money out of my IRA accounts, I wrote about the brain-numbing process of trying to calculate how much I should withdraw.  

When Sara and I were thinking about moving to Florida , I wrote about the pros and cons of relocating to a new community -- and the difficulty of leaving friends and family behind. (We decided not to move.) As the months rolled on, I faced a number of other retirement decisions and turned them into columns. They included:  

Trying to develop a retirement budget and an investment plan that would keep me from running out of money. (I never did get that quite right.)  

Deciding whether to continue to pay for the long-term-care policies we had bought through The Post. (We decided to keep them.)  

Figuring out how to stay happily married with Sara and me home together 24 hours a day. (The strategy: Sara has time for her activities, I have time for mine, and we spend the remaining time together.)  

I also wrote about my investment and financial mistakes:  

I recounted how I lost $70,000 during the bull market of the late 1990s by keeping most of my savings in a low-yielding money-market fund.  

I described how I took a monthly pension from The Post that left no benefit for my spouse after my death.  

I also told how I erred by taking my Social Security payments six months too soon and thus had to give back some of my Social Security benefits.  

On the lighter side, I also had time to write about some of our trips, including our 50th-anniversary cruise to the Panama Canal -- a splendid voyage until we ran into a nasty tropical storm.  

As I explored the frontiers of retirement, I was constantly surprised by the intense interest my fellow retirees showed in my columns. They often told me: "That's what happened to us," or "We tried to do the same thing" or "We made the same mistake." Many retirees, I found, are full of doubts about whether they are making the right financial and life-style choices. Older retirees, especially, worry about their health and the costs of a serious illness. Hoping to help other retirees, I wrote a book called "How to Retire Happy," published by McGraw-Hill in 2001 and updated in 2003.  

Along the way, I realized that Retirement Journal was more than a column. It was a bridge that took me from the heart-pounding tempo of daily deadlines to the slower, less stressful pace of a monthly column. The work was no less demanding, just less frenzied.  

But it worked for me, and I would tell people nearing retirement: Find a bridge that will help you, too, ease into retirement. Choose an activity that you love, one that will help you remain mentally and physically active and will maintain your connections to other people.  

All told, in my first seven years in retirement, I wrote 59 columns, including this one. Retiring from Retirement Journal will give me more time for personal and family activities -- and maybe even some golf.  

My interest in the subject of retirement remains intact. Like any reporter, I love a good story. And the forthcoming retirement of 77 million baby boomers -- including my own children -- will be one of the biggest social and cultural stories of all time. It will take years to play out, of course, but I expect a series of fierce struggles over how the nation will pay for the soaring costs of supporting and caring for America 's aging population.  

Indeed, the recent conflict over the creation of a Medicare prescription drug benefit, I believe, was not only about drugs, but also about where the nation will get the trillions of dollars needed to pay for retiree health care in the coming decades. An even more dramatic clash over the affordability of Social Security is not far away.  

Unfortunately for the boomers, they will retire in an era when the United States may be forced to divert billions of dollars each year from domestic needs to the struggle against global terrorism. About the time the boomers demand a growing share of the nation's financial resources, those resources may get scarcer and scarcer.  

If I were a young person choosing a career today, I would give serious thought to not only what kind of work I wanted to do, but to where I wanted to work. The retirees I know who are most secure financially, and have the best health and other benefits, are folks who worked for federal, state and local governments, as well as colleges and city and county school systems. Other well-off retirees include people who owned their own businesses and were able to sell them when they retired.  

In the corporate world, some companies still offer old-style pensions, but many firms have shed their pensions for the 401(k) plan, which puts the responsibility for saving and investing squarely on the shoulders of the employee. The tax-deferred feature of the 401(k) plan makes it hard to beat as a long-term investment. But, as we've seen, investment success depends heavily on the ups and downs of the financial markets and when a saver gets into the plan, and gets out.  

Thus, I would advise young people to redouble their efforts to save, to live frugally and to invest carefully. They will need those savings. By the time they retire, Social Security, Medicare and even Medicaid could be very different from what they are today. The nation, no doubt, will always provide help for the poorest of the poor. But for everybody else, the message in the future is likely to be: "You're on your own."  

Clearly, there are momentous days ahead for future retirees. Hopefully, there will be some quieter days for this retiree. 

Copyright © 2004 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us