Older
Women Were and Are Katrina's Worst Casualty
By
Margaret M. Gullette, WeNews
December
14, 2005
Editor's
Note:
The following is a commentary. The opinions expressed are those of the
author and not necessarily the views of Women's eNews.
Amid
all the devastations of Katrina, what group was most vulnerable?
If
you followed the news compassionately, you might say, "the
poor," "African Americans," "women of color." The
best answer is actually "old."
Older
New Orleanians were most at risk by being also predominantly poor, female,
African American, and (sometimes) weak, ill or institutionalized. They
couldn't crawl out on roofs or set off on highways alone with their
backpacks.
It's
not that some news didn't cover this. We know that dozens of helpless
people in one nursing home died, and a hospital is being investigated for
euthanasia. As the Houston Chronicle noted, Katrina was "one of the
worst medical catastrophes for the aged in recent
U.S.
history."
"The
elderly and critically ill plummeted to the bottom of priority lists as
calamity engulfed
New Orleans
," said a Sept. 19 New York Times article by David Rohde, et al.
Older
people "had special needs neglected by disaster workers. In
New Orleans
, some seniors died from dehydration even as they were being bused to
safety," reported Nancy Weaver Teichert in the Sacramento Bee.
Even
emergency workers may not know that dehydration comes faster in elderly
people and is harder to reverse.
"Most
Katrina Victims were Elderly," the
Washington
Post headlined Oct. 24.
Elderly Out of Focus
Yet
there in the media is that unwillingness to use the word "old"
or to conclude that this catastrophe is about old people. The information
was available but the focus was missing.
In
a "Frontline" Nov. 22 special report, Martin Smith reported that
the "vast majority" of the 1,300 people who died in
New Orleans
were old. But that shocking statistic claimed only one sentence's worth of
attention in an hour-long show.
Aside
from "old," the other missing keyword is "women."
Women live longer than men and tend to wind up widowed, alone or in
nursing homes. They are poorer than men. Almost 25 percent of women over
65 in
New Orleans
were poor, double the national average, according to the Washington-based
Older Women's League.
Were
women a vast majority of those who died? Were most elderly evacuees
female? Were most women of color? Check hurricane coverage in the media
archives under keywords like "elderly" and "women" and
you don't come up with much.
But
while you can't get to the bottom of the story, you can certainly collect
the evidence that older women bore the brunt. Newspaper stories about
Katrina that have anything about old people, missing people, unclaimed
dead or bodies recently found mostly refer to old women.
Aftermath Neglect Continues
Neglect
of age continues in the "aftermath" stories. Reporters have been
investigating conditions of prisoners and asking teen evacuees about their
"unique" problems. What about the unique problems of frail, sick
and old evacuees from the drowned city? Are they homesick, lonely,
suffering from post-traumatic stress?
Did
they have any Thanksgiving? What happened to the mothers and grandmothers?
I keep thinking of a photo I saw in the Boston Globe of an elderly woman
lying on a baggage remover at an airport. Has she moved on? And to what
kind of life?
Ah,
the disconnects. Here in the real world, elderly people--primarily poor
women and women of color--were the neediest in a national emergency that
took over the news. They were ignored, kept waiting for aid, died alone;
somehow they fell to the bottom of priority lists.
A
great opportunity now exists for educating the public about the multiple
conditions of old age, the later lives of women and the profound sources
and alienating effects of ageism. Every member of society benefits from
seeing its elderly well treated. But Katrina shows how hard it is for
younger people in charge of the story, the social response or the rescue
effort to put themselves in the shoes of the vulnerable elderly. That is
part of ageism: not hatred but ignorance, indifference and the failure to
imagine oneself as older and in need of care.
One
way to judge the coverage is to ask how it has changed anything.
Has
there been enough attention to the sufferings of our aged to change public
opinion and create better laws, rules or agencies for rescuing elderly
women and men, especially those trapped in institutions? Has there been
enough coverage to change private behavior, so that younger people
hesitate next time to leave elderly relatives? Are Americans now likelier
to be active on behalf of a collective anti-ageist agenda?
Is
it crystal clear that old people have as much right to survive as younger
people?
I
don't think so.
A Shameful Neglect of Age
Many
news sources can be given credit for bringing racism and classism to the
fore in Katrina coverage. But the American neglect of age is also
shameful.
"This
is a wake-up call," said frantic social workers and gerontologists in
Houston
doing triage. But to wake up Americans about age, the alarm clock has to
sound much louder than the tinkle provided by the press to date.
The
media need to focus on age with a sense of urgency. There's a politics of
aging in
America
. Misrepresentations of the elderly as "greedy geezers" must be
challenged. Covering the age beat better will require emphasizing that
elders are mainly women without pensions, living on Social Security--women
get considerably less than men--and dependent on Medicare. They are, alas,
even in dire circumstances invisible.
The
Bush budget tried to cut Medicaid even as exhausted and traumatized elders
return to
New Orleans
. Desperate to privatize old age, Wall Street, the business press and many
leading Republicans have dogged Social Security for a decade and never
give up.
If
Katrina coverage had done its job, it would have indelibly convinced the
most recalcitrant that old age needs to be spared these cruelties. Silence
can be fatal; in this disaster and all the ones to come.
Margaret
Morganroth Gullette is the prize-winning author of the 2004 "Aged by
Culture," which was chosen as a noteworthy book of the year by the
Christian Science Monitor. She is a resident scholar at the Women's
Studies Research Center,
Brandeis
University
.
Copyright © Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy | Contact
Us
|