|
New
Options (and Risks) in Home Care for Elderly
Jane Gross, New York Times
March 1, 2007
Dr. Diane E. Meier, a geriatrician at Mount Sinai Medical Center in New
York, is an expert on end-of-life care. So when her elderly parents
needed long-term help at home with bathing, dressing and cooking after
her father's stroke, she knew where to find assistance.
It was not through agencies in Manhattan that provide home health aides
who are bonded, insured and certified. A year of custodial care from
such an agency would cost her family $150,000, and in short order
exhaust its savings because aides are not covered by government
assistance unless patients are poor or fresh from a hospital stay.
Instead Dr. Meier turned to "a little list" of aides from the so-called
gray market, an over-the-back-fence network of women. They are usually
untrained, unscreened and unsupervised, but more affordable without an
agency's fee, less constrained by regulations and hired through personal
recommendation.
With 4.2 million Americans currently over 85 — a number expected to grow
to 5.9 million by 2014 and then accelerate with the baby boom generation
— the exploding need for long-term care is remaking the home-care
industry, driving more of it underground. Gray-market hiring, fraught
with risks, is a solution that middle-class families are turning to as
they face the crushing burden of indefinite home-care expenses. But it
is hardly the only one, as businesses rush to meet the needs of these
families, the fastest-growing segment of the marketplace, who are intent
on keeping their loved ones out of nursing homes.
Traditional agencies like the Visiting Nurse Service, founded to serve
the poor with all manner of home health care, are opening divisions
geared toward clients who must pay their own way. At VNS, 15 percent of
clients now pay out of pocket, an 11 percent increase over last year,
and aides trained in wound care and vital signs are also learning to
interact with doormen, use espresso machines or escort a client to the
opera.
At the same time, upscale agencies providing trained aides are
proliferating solely for the private-pay market, as are national chains
with more modest services — and more reasonable prices. These franchises
are intended for today's consumer of home health care who need simple
companionship, reminders to take medication, an escort to doctors'
appointments and help preparing meals.
The largest of these chains, Home Instead, opened in 1994 with six
franchises and now has 722. Their 37,000 part-time workers tend to the
needs of 43,000 elderly clients. The advantage is a lower hourly fee —
say, $15 an hour for nonmedical needs vs. $20 an hour for a trained
agency aide — and the disadvantage a scramble to find more skilled help
as a patient's health declines.
Policy experts worry that the new home health care businesses could put
profit above quality.
"Consumers are always in jeopardy when there's an opportunity to make a
lot of money," said Val J. Halamandaris, president of the National
Association of Home Care, who 40 years ago was chief counsel to the
Senate Committee on Aging. "Sometimes it works out beautifully, and
sometimes it doesn't. But nobody's policing it; that's for sure."
Gray-market hiring, which Dr. Meier says most of her patients choose, is
largely a financial decision to avoid the fees of home-care agencies,
where perhaps $9 of the $20 hourly fee goes to the aide. In a
gray-market arrangement, the aide might get $12, a 33 percent increase —
although sometimes without benefits, worker's compensation or Social
Security — leaving a family able to afford additional hours.
Many who have hired by word-of-mouth, without criminal background
checks, and paid directly cite the loyalty of employees and their
ability to work unfettered by regulations. Some agencies, for example,
prohibit their aides from lifting a patient who has fallen without
calling 911 or getting approval from a supervisor. That rule protects a
client from being moved improperly, the aide from injury and an agency
from liability. But some families shudder at the prospect of a loved one
lying on the floor.
Many families worry more about temperament than tasks. Dr. Meier, and
most of her patients say that entrusting someone with intimate care is
less a reasoned decision than an intuition about character.
"You can teach someone how to turn a bed-bound person," Dr. Meier said,
"but you can't teach the milk of human kindness."
Others say they chose gray-market employees if family members insisted
upon someone of the same race. That is why Michael Elsas, president of
Cooperative Home Care Associates in the Bronx, a worker-owned agency,
turned to what he called "the German au pair network," rather than his
own better-trained aides, for his mother. But as her Parkinson's disease
progressed, Mr. Elsas said, the au pairs were not up to the task. He
hired two aides from his agency, keeping one of the German women to
placate his mother.
"The cost quadrupled," Mr. Elsas said, to $1,400 a week, from $350.
Referrals from corporate employee-assistance plans and also coverage
under long-term care insurance are fueling the growth of the
full-service agencies. Senior Bridge, for example, has expanded from New
York City to 18 suburban and Sun Belt locations. And House Works in
Boston, a boutique agency with fewer than 700 clients, has seen its
gross revenue grow in six years to $9 million, from $590,000.
According to the American Association of Long-Term Care Insurance, a
trade group for agents, more than one-third of the $63.3 billion in
benefits paid in 2006 went toward home care. But policies differ in
whether they cover only certified aides or a broader menu including
gray-market employees or companions. And state insurance officials worry
about the pressure to deny benefits as more policyholders, now in their
50s and 60s, begin to make claims.
The demand for home care aides throughout the industry is expected to
outstrip supply. The Bureau of Labor Statistics counted 663,280 such
aides in 2005, up from 577,530 in 1999, a tally that does not include
gray-market workers. But the Census Bureau reports a stagnant number of
women with little education, ages 25 to 54, the traditional labor pool
for this occupation, just as the 85-and-over population is soaring.
Innovators in the field are looking for ways to reduce turnover,
estimated at 40 percent to 100 percent a year by various agencies. This
so-called churn results in an inexperienced and uncommitted work force.
The Service Employees International Union has been at the cutting edge
of creating a more stable pool of workers. In New York, Local 1199
unionized 60,000 home-care employees. Unionized aides, many of them
former welfare recipients, get a full array of benefits, rare in this
industry, and opportunities to master English, study nursing or learn
computer skills.
One of the union's newest offerings is a sort of consciousness-raising
group, focusing on self-esteem and a sense of community among otherwise
isolated workers. Last month, 13 aides from an agency in Queens shared
their gripes with a facilitator. Many had been summoned from clients'
homes just moments before the workshop. This sort of administrative
confusion was typical, they said, and along with wages, which average
$9.34 an hour nationwide, is their main complaint. But aides also said
clients criticized their broken English, refused to eat their ethnic
food, touched them inappropriately or assumed they would steal.
The Visiting Nurse Service is raising its pay scale to $10 an hour by
2008. Compensation will be tied to seniority, which VNS hopes will
reduce turnover, and to the completion of specialty training in areas
like Alzheimer's disease, which will provide career ladders for aides.
By all accounts, there is only one training program in the country for
gray-market aides, at the Schmieding Center for Senior Health and
Education at the University of Arkansas. There, Dr. Larry Wright, a
geriatrician, designed a 119-hour curriculum for independent
contractors, most enrolled by private employers. The course costs only
$275, thanks to the subsidy of a benefactor.
Dr. Wright makes a case for buttressing the independent work force.
"If I saw agencies doing fantastic work, it would be one thing," said
Dr. Wright, who says most agencies do little more than criminal
background checks. "But there's not much value added and significant
cost."
Even the best-trained agency aides wind up improvising in the privacy of
a client's home. It may be against the rules to escort patients in a
private vehicle or use their credit cards when shopping. But Mr. Elsas,
of Cooperative Home Care Associates, has no doubt it happens.
"The system depends on the good judgment and integrity of workers who
may be making $7 an hour," he said. "What's wrong with that picture?"
One effort to instill good judgment is a peer-mentoring program at Mr.
Elsas's agency where senior aides make in-home visits to newcomers. But
a home setting precludes the oversight found in nursing homes, tightened
after the scandals of the 1970s. Setting national standards for agency
employees, independent contractors and even family caretakers is one
goal of a conference in March at the International Longevity Center in
New York.
Sheila Baker, a geriatric social worker who has hired gray-market help
for her mother, prefers informal oversight. At Mount Sinai's geriatric
clinic, for example, aides escorting patients to medical appointments
are always asked to leave the room long enough for the elderly person to
speak freely about the arrangement. And at Ms. Baker's mother's
apartment, even with a gray-market aide who was once a physician in the
Philippines, Ms. Baker and her sister, a nurse, make unannounced visits.
Larry Minnix, head of the American Association of Homes and Services for
the Aging, advocates national standards to prevent a repeat of the
nursing home scandals in the home-care arena. And he speaks from
personal experience.
Before they died, Mr. Minnix's in-laws were cared for at home by one
beloved aide hired from the gray market. That aide, in turn, hired
friends for additional help. One, who did yard work, had a criminal
record. Another, with a family of nine, ran up exorbitant grocery bills
because she was taking most of the food home. But his in-laws, Mr.
Minnix said, were dependent on the original aide and fearful of changing
the arrangement.
"This could happen to anyone," he said. "And it's something the country
doesn't know what to do about yet."
|
|