Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 

DonateNow

 

 

Single Agent Gemzar® or Vinorelbine Appropriate Treatment Options for Treatment of Some Elderly with NSCLC

Yahoo News, July 15, 2003

According to a recent article published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, the use of either Gemzar® (gemcitabine) or Navelbine® (vinorelbine) alone may be just as effective with fewer side effects than the combination of these two agents for some patients over 70 years of age with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. However, it is important for patients to discuss all treatment options with their physician, as existing medical conditions and overall patient health may affect treatment decisions.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. Lung cancer is characterized by the cell type from which is arose, such as non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stages IIIB and IV (metastatic) NSCLC refers to cancer that has spread from the lung to several and/or distant sites in the body. Standard treatment for advanced NSCLC involves chemotherapy. Researchers have been comparing several different combinations of chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC to determine optimal regimens. Until recently, many elderly patients with metastatic NSCLC were treated only with supportive care. It is estimated that only 20% of elderly patients with advanced lung cancer ever receive chemotherapy. Previous studies, however, have suggested that palliative chemotherapy in this group of patients achieves results comparable with those achieved in their younger counterparts. As a generality, combination chemotherapy offers better palliation for patients with locally advan! ced or metastatic NSCLC than do single agents. However, the situation is less clear for patients older than age 70 years due to co-existing medical conditions or age-related reduction in organ function.

Researchers from Italy recently conducted a clinical trial called the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study (MILES) to compare treatment with single agent chemotherapy agents Gemzar and Navelbine to the combination of these agents in patients with stage IIIB or stage IV NSCLC. Patients in this trial were 70 years of age or older and were randomly selected to receive initial treatment with Gemzar alone, Navelbine alone or the combination of Gemzar plus Navelbine. An average of 3 organs were affected by cancer in these patients and 60% of patients had pre-existing heart conditions. Six months following therapy, progression-free survival was approximately 30% for all groups of patients. Overall estimated survival at one year following therapy was 38% for patients treated with Navelbine, 28% for patients treated with Gemzar and 30% for patients treated with Navelbine plus Gemzar. There were more reported side effects in the group of patients treated with Gemzar ! or Navelbine alone, compared to patients treated with the combination.

These researchers concluded that single agent Gemzar or Navelbine are appropriate treatment options for patients with advanced NSCLC over the age of 70 years. However, they stress that drug side effects, co-existing medical complications or age-related organ function and patient preference all need to be considered when deciding upon a treatment option. In addition, the researchers suggest that depending upon the chemotherapy agents being used, some combination chemotherapy treatments provide superior results to single agents. Clinical trials for advanced NSCLC are ongoing to compare various chemotherapy agents alone or in combination. Patients with advanced NSCLC over the age of 70 with concomitant medical conditions may wish to speak with their physician about the risks and benefits of single-agent Gemzar or Navelbine or the participation in a clinical trial evaluating other novel therapeutic options.

Source: 411Cancer.com "Cancer Experts leading the way to optimal cancer care."

Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us