|
SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | ||
|
Japan May 2006
Since the
Second World War, Japan has gone through rapid industrialization and
urbanization as well as improved nutrition and living conditions that have
sharply reduced the nation's death rate.1 As a result, in the
past 60 years, Japan 's life expectancy at birth (LEB) has grown 28 years
for men (to age 78) and 31 years for women (to age 85, see Table 1). Japan
's overall LEB of 82 years—the highest in the world—is four years
longer than that for the United States.2 But can
longevity in Japan continue to rise in the face of the country's changing
dietary and lifestyle habits? Rising affluence has come with a cost:
increased meat consumption and rising body mass indices, which have put
the Japanese at increased risk of contracting chronic, potentially fatal
diseases such as heart attack, stroke, diabetes, and some cancers.3
In addition, rates of smoking have increased dramatically in Japan since
the Second World War, especially among men. As a result, the top three
causes of death in Japan are now cancer, cardiovascular disease, and
stroke.4 These changes
in habit may also be creating a ceiling against further increases in the
country's LEB. Indeed, a 1995 study showed that Japan had slipped to sixth
place in the world regarding life expectancy for people who had reached
age 80.5 Yet Japan has been slow to respond to upswings in the
death rates from chronic diseases with appropriate public health measures. To determine
which public health steps might be the most effective in maintaining Japan
at the forefront of countries with the longest longevity, we analyzed the
top six underlying medical causes of death in Japan in 2000. The results
may hold lessons not only for Japan, but for other postindustrial
societies struggling with combating chronic diseases. Comparing Medical Causes of Death: The Multiple-Decrement Life
Table
Because
underlying medical conditions often share risk factors (obesity, for
instance, puts someone at risk of diabetes, colorectal cancer, breast
cancer, heart disease, or stroke, among other illnesses), we use a multiple-decrement
life table to determine the diagnoses that are most responsible for
shortening lives (see Table 2). Table 2
aIf
one does not die from the other possible causes. The
multiple-decrement life table allows us to calculate the life expectancy
at birth for someone who will ultimately die from a particular underlying
medical cause while also facing a full set of competing causes (Table 2,
column 1). The medical diagnosis that kills earliest in the life course
produces the shortest life expectancy at birth. Also, the
multiple-decrement life table allows us to determine the life expectancy
between birth and age 85 if a particular underlying medical cause of death
were eliminated from the set of competing medical causes (Table 2, column
2). The diagnosis that (if it could be eliminated as a cause of death)
would produce the longest life expectancy from birth to age 85 is the one
that is most responsible for shortening lives in the population as a
whole. (The LEB only up to the 85th birthday is calculated in column 2
because the exact age at death in the oldest age group of Japanese—ages
85 and older—is unknown.) Suicide Table 2 shows
that the LEB is shortest for those Japanese who will ultimately die from
suicide. If suicide
could be wiped out as a cause of death while the risks of dying from other
causes remained the same, would that offer Japanese the highest possible
life expectancy from birth to at least age 85? The intuitive
answer is yes. But Table 2, column 2 shows that eliminating suicide would
offer only the fourth-highest life expectancy between birth and age 85 for
both men and women in Japan. The reason? At ages 45-64, when the rate of
deaths by suicide is highest during the life course, suicide still
competes heavily with cancer and heart disease to be the cause of death.
Thus, eradicating cancer, heart disease, or stroke would produce a longer
life expectancy between birth and age 85 than would eliminating suicide. Lung
Inflammation On the other
hand, those Japanese who die from inflammation of the lungs—from
bronchitis, influenza, or pneumonia—have the longest LEB (see Table 2,
column 1). Other studies have confirmed this finding for the United
States: When Americans reach age 55 in robust condition, they are more
likely than their less healthy peers to live to the oldest-old ages and
then die from respiratory disease. But the elimination of lung
inflammation as a cause of death would yield the shortest life expectancy
between birth and age 85 (see Table 2, column 2) because this cause of
death strikes hardest at the oldest ages, where the smallest incremental
gains in life expectancy can be made. How Public Health Policy Can Further Increase Life Expectancy
in Japan
For both
sexes in Japan, eliminating cancer as a cause of death would produce the
longest life expectancy for everyone before age 85: 78.60 years for males
and 81.88 years for females. Our findings hold several implications for
public health policies in Japan. Smoking and
cancer. Cigarette
smoking is implicated in mortality from lung cancer and liver cancer, both
of which have been rising in Japanese men since the 1950s. On May 1, 2003,
the first-ever smoking-related law in Japan went into effect to prevent
passive smoking in public. This law requires restaurants to encourage the
reduction of smoking, but it carries no penalties for noncompliance.
Restaurant owners in Japan are not required to provide smoke-free dining
rooms. The law is
proving ineffective. A recent study of 163 restaurants in Yonago City
found that only six restaurants were smoke-free or had nonsmoking sections
in their dining rooms. Seventy-four percent of the owners did not even
know about the law.6 Those who knew but did not comply said
that they would lose business if they reserved seating for nonsmokers or
that they had insufficient money to spend on segregating tables by smoking
status or on ventilation systems. Amendment of this public health law to
impose stiff fines for noncompliance will be necessary to reduce
environmental tobacco smoke in public restaurants. New York City
's success at curbing adult smoking suggests that multiple antismoking
policies will also probably be needed in Japan to reduce the prevalence of
smoking. In 2002, New York raised its state and city tax on a pack of
cigarettes by $1.81, to $3.00 a pack. In 2003, New York City also enacted
a package of antismoking measures—including a ban on smoking in all
indoor work areas (including bars and restaurants); nicotine replacement
therapy; and a media campaign. As a result,
the prevalence rate of adult smoking in New York City declined by 11
percent, from 21.6 percent to 19.2 percent.7 Of the reasons New
York City residents gave for reducing their smoking in 2002-2003, between
33 percent and 54 percent said they were motivated by the tax hike.8 By contrast,
Japan raised its tobacco tax by 0.82 yen (less than one U.S. penny) per
cigarette in July 2005. The trivial increase reflects the conflict of
interest faced by the Ministry of Finance due to the valuable tax revenue
it collects from the sale of tobacco and its fears that increased taxes
would cut into those sales. However, New York City's revenue from the sale
of tobacco increased tenfold despite a 15 percent decline between 2002 and
2003 in the number of cigarettes purchased there.9 Because the
smoking prevalence rate of Japanese men is about 47 percent, multiple
public health policies (including a substantial hike in the tobacco tax)
will likely be needed in Japan to reduce smoking there to parity with that
for New York City adults.10 Female cancer
mortality. Breast cancer and colorectal cancer
mortality rates have risen in females over the past several decades in
Japan, partly because of Japanese women's growing consumption of animal
fat. Female mortality from these forms of cancer can be curbed through
nutritional education programs that emphasize the indigenous diet of fish
and vegetables and the advantage of low-sodium soy sauce. Rising affluence
may have created a receptive audience. Recently, increasing numbers of
health-seeking consumers in Japan have started to turn back to old-time
cereals such as unpolished rice and foxtail millet.11 Nevertheless,
stomach cancer remains the most common site of terminal cancer in Japanese
women. Although only a small percentage (13 percent) of women in Japan
smoke, public health initiatives to curb smoking will reduce their
mortality from stomach cancer, since tobacco consumption is correlated
with the disease.12 Japan provides free screening for stomach
cancer to those Japanese ages 40 and older, but only a minority avail
themselves of this service.13 Media campaigns are needed to
publicize the importance of stomach-cancer screening. Curbing
Influenza.
The ceiling on the LEB in Japan can also be raised if deaths from
pulmonary infections are curbed. Most Japanese people who die of influenza
have not been vaccinated against it. The influenza injection rate fell
from about 130 vaccinations per 1,000 in 1985 to less than 10 per 1,000 in
1997, the last year for which we have data.14 The drop-off in
vaccination has been attributed to "poorly designed"
epidemiological studies that have challenged the effectiveness of
influenza vaccines.15 It behooves the public health community
to design influenza vaccine trials carefully; to inform the public if the
vaccine proves effective; or (if the vaccine is not effective) to improve
it. Implications for Other Post-Industrial Societies
Life
expectancy at birth in Japan can surpass 80 years for men and approach 90
years for women in the 21st century if the country's public health
community declares war on cancer. Unlike Japan, heart disease produces the
highest death rate in the United States ; but smoking cessation and
complex medical management of heart disease after diagnosis are delaying
deaths from this cause and putting more Americans at risk of cancer
mortality. The age-adjusted death rates from both heart disease and cancer
declined between 2002 and 2003 in the United States (to 232.3 deaths and
191.5 deaths per 100,000 people, respectively), but the decline was
steeper for heart disease (3.5 percent versus 1.8 percent).16 If the
current trend continues, cancer will emerge as the leading cause of death
in the United States as well. It behooves public health institutions in
both societies to promote multiple, synergistic policies that emphasize
cancer prevention, early diagnosis, and careful medical management. References 1.
Linda
G. Martin, "The Graying of Japan," Population Bulletin
44, no. 2 (1989); and Economic Planning Agency, White Paper on the
National Lifestyle (Tokyo: Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 1995). 2.
Population
Reference Bureau, 2005 World Population Data Sheet (Washington DC,
2005). 3.
Vaclav
Smil, "Eating Meat: Evolution, Patterns, and Consequences," Population
and Development Review 28, no. 4 (2002): 599-639. 4.
Ministry
of Health, Labor, and Welfare, Vital Statistics 2000 (2003),
accessed online at www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/jinkou/suii00/deth10.html,
on Feb. 14, 2006. 5.
Kenneth
G. Manton and James W. Vaupel, "Survival After the Age of 80 in the
United States, Sweden, France, England and Japan," The New England
Journal of Medicine 333, no. 18 (1995): 1232-35. 6.
Kazuhiko
Kotani et al., "A Survey of Restaurant Smoking Restrictions in a
Japanese City," Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine 207
(2005): 73-79. 7.
Thomas
R. Frieden et al., "Adult Tobacco Use Levels After Intensive Tobacco
Control Measures: New York City, 2002-2003," American Journal of
Public Health 95, no. 6 (2005): 1016-23. 8.
Frieden
et al., "Adult Tobacco Use Levels After Intensive Tobacco Control
Measures": 1021. 9.
Frieden
et al., "Adult Tobacco Use Levels After Intensive Tobacco Control
Measures." 10.
Kotani
et al., "A Survey of Restaurant Smoking Restrictions in a Japanese
City." 11.
Shinichi
Tokuda, "Health Seekers Turn Back to Old-Time Cereals," Knight
Ridder Tribune Business News, March 10, 2005. 12.
Kotani
et al., "A Survey of Restaurant Smoking Restrictions in a Japanese
City." 13.
Omer
Gersten and John R. Wilmoth, "The Cancer Transition in Japan since
1951," Demographic Research 7, no. 5 (2002): 271-306. 14.
Kazuo
Inoue, "Protecting Japan from Influenza," Nature Medicine
5, no. 6 (1999): 592. 15.
Inoue,
"Protecting Japan from Influenza." D.L. Hoyert et al., "Deaths: Final Data for 2003," Health E-Stats (Jan. 19, 2006), accessed online at www.cdc.gov/nchs, on Feb. 14, 2006. .
|