|
SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | ||
Some related articles : |
Universal
vaccination would 'benefit society' US
researchers are recommending everyone receives a flu jab, not just the
elderly and others vulnerable to the virus. They say the
benefits outweigh the costs involved. In this
year's immunisation campaign in the UK, the Department of Health will
target over-65s and vulnerable groups, such as those with asthma or heart
disease, and people with weakened immune systems. People who
fall outside these groups are not normally given flu vaccinations, as they
are better equipped to fight off flu, and it is thought that the
occasional bout of flu improves their long-term resistance.
UK public
health experts have cast doubt on the practicalities of universal
vaccination. But the US
study suggested vaccinating young adults could be beneficial. Researchers
used a computer model to assess whether mass vaccination was worth the
time and money. Costs and
benefits Flu is a
viral disease characterised by nasal congestion, dry cough and fever. People with
the virus tend to have at least two days off work. The US team
collated previously published data on the costs and benefits of flu
vaccination. They looked
at the costs of the vaccine and drugs, work days lost to illness and how
effective medications were. Over 200
patients at a primary care clinic were also surveyed on how willing they
were to pay for medications. All this
information was then entered into a computer model that calculated whether
there was a net benefit or cost. A thousand
different calculations were made, with variations such as changes to the
cost of flu vaccines. Vaccination
offered cost-benefits in 95% of scenarios. Non-vaccination was only the
best option during a very mild flu season. Treating flu
patients with antiviral medications was the best option in 85% of the
team's calculations. 'Needy first'
Dr Patrick
Lee, an internal medicine specialist at Stanford Hospital and Clinics,
California, said: "There has been a lot of debate about optimal
treatment strategies. "Our
study shows that society as a whole benefits if you vaccinate the entire
population and use antiviral medications on those who get sick." Dr Lee said:
"For most flu seasons, it is cost-beneficial for the whole society to
be vaccinated. "But, if
there's not enough vaccine to go around, you need to vaccinate those who
need it most first." He added
using a computer model was better than clinical trials. He said:
"Clinical trials are snapshots in time. They look at one flu season
and one flu vaccine." Logistical
problems But a
spokesman for the Public Health Laboratory Service, which covers England
and Wales, told BBC News Online that while universal vaccination might
"look good on paper", questions remained. He said:
"Policy-makers also need to consider in detail the logistics of
delivering flu vaccine to many millions of people every year, and the
practicalities of delivering flu drugs which need to be given within 36
hours of the onset of symptoms. "There
are many other respiratory diseases which circulate in the winter besides
flu which lead to loss of days worked," he added. "Many
studies around the world have in fact shown no difference in absentee
rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated workers." The study is published in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine. FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Action on Aging distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|