U.N. United in AIDS Fight but Split Over What to Do
By: Jennifer Steinhauer
The New York Times, June 27, 2001
UNITED NATIONS, June 26 — While a special session of the United Nations
grasps this week for a show of unity on the worldwide AIDS epidemic,
participants are divided among hundreds of different views on how to
approach the problem, how to spend the money promised for a global AIDS
fund and even who should take part in the debate.
Those differences have played out in ways both dramatic and small during
the special session, which began here on Monday.
Twenty years after AIDS first began to take its toll, officials could not
agree on which groups they should even proclaim at risk. Because of
objections by Islamic delegates, debate continued over whether to mention
gays and prostitutes — groups long acknowledged to have been hit hardest
by the disease — in the official declaration. A draft of the
declaration, scheduled for a General Assembly vote on Wednesday, urges all
countries to protect the rights of people with AIDS.
At the outset, the special assembly was sidetracked with a lengthy and
acrimonious debate over whether a representative from a gay group should
be permitted to participate in a roundtable discussion (nearly a dozen
assembly members opposed it, with a Malaysian delegate openly condemning
the eventual decision to include the representative).
Outside the assembly's formal sessions, small conference rooms are filled
with accounts of the devastation of AIDS around the world, the underlying
causes of its spread in certain countries and the implied competing
interests over how a proposed $9 billion pot of new money to fight AIDS
globally will be distributed.
Indeed, while the official debate has centered largely around the cost of
AIDS drugs and their availability, most people outside the official
delegations are more concerned with addressing the basic problems that
have contributed to or resulted from AIDS: a lack of even rudimentary
health clinics in districts of Nepal where thousands have died from
diarrhea; grandmothers in Uganda who have no income and are raising a half
dozen orphans, many of them infected with AIDS; widespread starvation in
various African villages where everyone who used to farm the crops is
either dead or sick.
"There has been an overemphasis in this conference about drugs,"
said Vijay Rajkumar, a Nepal-based AIDS adviser for Save the Children.
"The lack of drinking water is a much bigger priority in most
countries than anti-retroviral treatments."
The wide chasm between those who write policies and pay for programs and
those who have to make them work on the ground is as old as the
international development field itself. But the stakes have never been as
high: AIDS has killed nearly 22 million people worldwide, and infection
rates are rising rapidly in many countries.
This session, the first that the United Nations has devoted to a health
care subject, has made it clear that stemming AIDS requires complex and
sensitive strategies that vary greatly from country to country, perhaps
frustrating Secretary General Kofi Annan's plea to "combine
leadership, partnership and solidarity."
What to do about Mauritania, for instance, where condoms are all but
illegal? What about rural Kenya, where the practice of passing wives down
from one infected brother to another is common in some villages with high
illiteracy among women? "We are looking for solutions like everyone
else," said Jane Mumbi Kiano, who represents the National Council of
Women of Kenya. "You have all kinds of posters but some of our women
cannot read or write. We are very concerned about this global fund."
The clashes among cultures became evident on the first day of the session.
Besides the scuffle over the representative from the gay group, trouble
immediately erupted when the official delegation began its central task of
working out a universal "declaration of commitment" on the fight
against AIDS.
Some Islamic countries quickly objected because a draft of
the declaration included gays and prostitutes in the groups of people
particularly at risk for contracting the disease.
The issue created heat in the hallways and in the Café Vienna, the
smoke-filled cafeteria where visitors deconstruct the day's events.
A woman with a large floppy hat who identified herself
simply as Pamela carried around a sign condemning the exclusion of sex
workers from the proposed declaration. Equally concerned was Roma
Debabrata, who runs an organization in India to stop the sexual
trafficking of women and children.
"The language is a problem," Ms. Debabrata
said. "You must be absolutely clear, with no side tracking about who
needs intervention in this draft."
And while some groups drew controversy, others seem to have been largely
ignored. For instance, when most health organizations tally up those who
are most at risk for AIDS, they tend to identify sexually active people as
those under 49 years. Safe- sex literature tends to be written for younger
people and distributed in places where they congregate.
"People over 50 are not considered sexual
beings," said Paul Godfred, a training adviser from HelpAge
International, citing a town in Thailand where 394 people out of 4,000
with H.I.V., the virus that causes AIDS, are over 60. Mr. Godfred recalled
an education session for older people in India where the group addressed
asked for condoms. Confused but agreeable, the AIDS worker brought a
basket the next day, and they immediately disappeared.
Death is often only the beginning of the problems for communities in some
of the world's poorest nations, especially the elderly. In much of Asia
and Africa, the elderly are often left to care for their grandchildren
orphaned by AIDS, without the financial support of their own children, now
dead, that they had counted on all their lives. Many are widowed and with
few resources. Livestock is often sold to pay for medications and
funerals. When children die, government subsidies to care for them end
too.
AIDS has also created other public health problems that require vast
resources, like widespread hunger among the rural poor. The United
Nation's Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that roughly seven
million agricultural workers with AIDS have died since the mid- 1980's,
leaving hunger and economic devastation; in Kenya, for instance, between
49 percent and 78 percent of household income is lost when one person with
AIDS dies.
Poverty in rural areas in turn leads to the spread of H.I.V., as men seek
work in cities and contract the virus and women turn to prostitution
themselves as a means of income. Prevention messages, an area where much
AIDS money is spent, are often inconsistent with the way people live.
"The rural poor are impervious to traditional prevention
methods," said Gary Howe, the director of the International Fund for
Agricultural Development in the East and Southern African division.
In official speeches from the delegates, there is vague language about
cultural sensitivity in safe-sex literature. But the causes of the spread
of AIDS are often so specific to a particular country that they defy any
global solution.
In Kenya, wife inheritance and genital mutilation with
shared needles has been a contributing factor, said Ida B. Odinga, from
that nation's League of Women Voters. Mali Bent Sidi, a women's rights
worker in Mauritania, described how the sharing of needles to pierce
children's ears had contributed to the spread of AIDS, as well as an
almost official ban on condoms.
Many groups said that discussions about anti-retroviral drugs was highly
irrelevant in many areas where there are no clinics to distribute them, no
clean water or food to take them with and a lack of even basic antibiotics
to stave off the less onerous infections that stem from H.I.V.
All of these concerns need money, and many of the nongovernment groups
feared that the new money that world leaders have called for to stop AIDS
will get sucked up by administrative costs, corrupt governments and the
single area of AIDS drugs. "I fear that a major chunk of the global
health fund will go to drugs," said Mr. Rajkumar, of Nepal. "And
that means money for drug companies and not for infrastructure."
Using local groups familiar with the problems of their region is a long-
held practice by the United Nations, but many fear that the flow of money
will not come their way. "International AIDS agencies have come with
money before and it all goes to overhead and not where it belongs,"
said Pearl Nswahili, founder of STOP AIDS in Nigeria. "This meeting
has huge talk but not a lot of action.
"There are lots of documents," she added, but "we still
don't have any condoms."
|