|
SEARCH | SUBSCRIBE | ||
Some related articles : |
Adding
Years to Life and Life to Years
By Jane E. Brody
The New York
Times June
2, 1998
People
with bad health habits that they will not or cannot abandon often make
excuses: "What's the point of living longer -- you'll only spend more
years in a nursing home?" or "A healthy life really isn't any
longer, it just seems that way." Perhaps
the saddest excuse of all dates back to 1964 when the Surgeon General
issued the first report on smoking and health. Diehard smokers told me,
"By the time I get lung cancer, they'll know how to cure it." If
only that had happened. But 34 years later we are hardly closer to curing
lung cancer than we were then. The
fact is none of these excuses hold up under the scrutiny of sound medical
research, and a recently published study of more than 1,700 men and women
followed for 32 years puts the lie to them all. The
study, published in April in The New England Journal of Medicine, clearly
showed that people with healthier habits not only live longer, they live
better, experiencing only half as much chronic disability as their
less-prudent age mates. The
findings strongly suggest that vitality into one's later years is less a
matter of genes and more a question of how a person chooses to live. Those
who smoked the least, stayed trim and exercised regularly not only lived
longer but were less likely to develop disabilities. Even among
participants who died, the low-risk people had shorter periods of
disability before dying. Changing
Mortality Curve In
1980, Dr. James Fries, professor of medicine at Stanford University,
published a provocative article suggesting that preventive health
practices would keep Americans healthier longer and change the shape of
the nation's disability and death curve from one that resembles a water
slide to one that looks more like a cliff. According
to his "compression of morbidity" hypothesis, most Americans,
instead of experiencing a more-or-less steady rate of increasing
disability and deaths starting at mid-life, could live reasonably well
into their 80's, before they begin to die at an accelerated rate. To
put it another way, if people could be persuaded to choose more prudent
health habits, the majority would reach their ninth decade in good health
and then die after, at most, a relatively brief period of illness. But
some skeptics challenged Fries, suggesting instead that practicing good
health habits, while likely to add years to life, would also swell the
number of years during which people are beset by chronic illness and
disability. If true, critics said, this would further overwhelm an already
overburdened system struggling to care for millions of elderly Americans
with costly, debilitating, lingering health problems. Healthy
Habits Do Pay Now,
nearly two decades after Fries's proposal, he and his colleagues have data
that dispute the naysayers. According to their new findings, living
healthfully would not only add years to life, it would also add life to
years, keeping people well and able to enjoy life far longer than they
otherwise might have. Although
the participants' average age was only 75 at the last assessment, there is
every indication that those with healthy habits will on average remain in
better health however long they live. Those whose habits put them at
lowest risk for health problems delayed the average age at which they
developed even minimal disability by nearly seven years -- to age 73 as
against age 66 for those at highest risk. The
researchers tracked 1,741 men and women who graduated from the University
of Pennsylvania in 1939 and 1940. These alumni were surveyed by other
researchers at the time of graduation and again in 1962, 1976 and 1980
before the Stanford team took over and reassessed their health habits and
health status annually for seven years starting in 1986. Participants
were classified as being at high, moderate or low risk based on three
modifiable factors known to contribute to poor health: cigarette smoking,
excess weight and inactivity. At every assessment -- even when the
participants were only about 43 years old -- those at highest risk were
more likely to report disabilities than those at moderate risk, who in
turn had more disabilities than those at low risk. The
authors emphasize that for the overwhelming majority these risk factors
are matters of personal choice. But it is all too obvious that a growing
number are making the wrong choices. Although
tens of millions of adults have quit smoking in the last 34 years, we now
face the chilling fact that as many as 40 percent of students in some high
schools are smoking. The tobacco industry has been particularly successful
in hooking teen-age girls and young blacks on this noxious weed. And if
you think young Americans smoke too much, in many European countries it is
hard to find any young person without a cigarette. Obesity,
too, is a growing concern. Americans on the whole are fatter now than at
any time in our history. People tend to blame the ready availability of
high-calorie foods and the constant temptation to eat too much, especially
too much fatty, sugary foods. Few seem to have the will to resist
overindulging. But
the food supply and eating habits are not the only culprits. Inactivity
has a major, deleterious influence on the weight of Americans. Having
created a society replete with labor-saving devices, we failed to
compensate adequately for our relative inactivity by building more
exercise into our daily routines and leisure time. Only
about one American in five gets enough exercise to keep weight down and
health up. And there is virtually no physical activity in the lives of 60
percent of Americans, whose exercise consists of little more than pressing
a finger to the television remote. Yet,
those who exercise regularly weigh less and are better able to achieve and
maintain weight loss. Thus, in addition to its direct health benefits, for
example, in preventing cardiovascular diseases and cancer, exercise can
help control weight. Other
factors not assessed in the Fries study also influence health. But the
people who stayed trim and exercised, in all likelihood, regularly ate
more healthfully as well. I think you get the point: at any stage of life,
it pays to pay attention to preventive health practices. Good health and
longevity are largely in your hands. LIVING LONGER, LIVING BETTER A study of University of Pennsylvania graduates, classes of 1939 and 1940, indicates that those who practice healthy habits stay free of disabilities longer. Class members were divided into low, moderate and high risk groups based on weight, exercise and use of tobacco. Those groups then were rated on a disability index based on eight basic tasks: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, bathing and other hygiene, reaching, gripping and executing basic chores. A score of 0.1 indicates some difficulty in performing one of the tasks. A score of 1.0 means some difficulty performing all eight tasks. And the maximum score of 3.0 indicates inability to perform all eight tasks. width=285 height=159> Sources: Dr. Anthony J. Vita and Dr. Raymond R. Balise
FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Action on Aging distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C § 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|