Putting a Price on Retirement
By Kevin Hassett, Bloomberg News
April 4, 2007
If you are like most people, odds are you aren't
saving enough for retirement.
You set some aside when you can, but probably you never analyzed the
problem carefully. That likely means you are setting yourself up for a
nasty surprise.
Fortunately, you don't need to go to graduate school in economics to
acquire the tools needed to avoid a shock. A new study by Dartmouth
economist Jonathan Skinner provides a fascinating guide to the best
retirement strategies.
The economics of retirement is pretty simple. One of the building blocks
of modern economic theory is the idea that people tend to enjoy each
bite of consumption less than their previous bite. That means your
happiness during a year where you spend a lot more isn't equal to your
unhappiness when your consumption goes down by the same amount.
If you accept that principle, then an optimal plan would smooth out your
consumption throughout your lifetime.
So, to an economist at least, retirement is a pretty easy problem. You
simply figure out how much you need to save, so you can have about the
same level of spending every year. When your income is high, you don't
consume it all, saving money instead for the years where your income is
low.
Using ESPlanner, a commercially available computer program first
developed by economists Laurence Kotlikoff and Jagadeesh Gokhale,
Skinner estimates the amount of wealth that people need to have to
maintain their standard of living in retirement. The analysis suggests
you need a surprisingly large amount of money to keep up your standard
of living. A couple that has gone through life with two children and
with an income of $136,000 needs to have $850,000 in the bank, and a
paid-off house, if they expect to maintain their living standard.
Skinner lists a number of markers along the way that can let you know
whether you're on track. At 40, this couple should have $167,000 in the
bank, and at 50 they should have $399,000.
That same couple with an income of $272,000 needs to save a lot more, of
course. They should try to have $1.53 million when they retire, and
would need to have $316,000 at age 40 and $590,000 at age 50. Skinner
also lays out a wide array of other incomes and scenarios.
The evidence suggests many people aren't saving nearly that much. One
study cited by Skinner found that fully a third of Americans see a drop
in their consumption of at least 33 percent when they retire. Some 73
percent of retirees report they wish they had saved more as they planned
for retirement.
Are these targets really big enough? Maybe not. Retiree expenditures on
health care have skyrocketed, as out-of-pocket charges in Medicare have
gone up. Currently, there is a 20 percent co-payment, and the first day
of a hospital stay must be paid for by the patient.
When you work these into the analysis, the numbers are really quite
startling. In 2004, 15 percent of American retirees paid more than 25
percent of their income in health bills; 6 percent paid more than 50
percent.
Given that such expenses are likely to become bigger, and more common,
it is probably a good idea to think of the numbers Skinner presents as
minimums. If you want some insurance against scary health expenditures
when you retire, you probably will need more.
Why do so many miss the boat when planning for retirement? The evidence
indicates that procrastination may be the biggest problem. People who
bother to think carefully about the situation and evaluate their likely
consumption needs generally do fine when they retire.
It's not that people are unable to save the correct amounts; it's that
they tend not to think about what the right amount might be.
Most of us just spent hours and hours gathering up all our financial
information for the Internal Revenue Service. Now would be a perfect to
time to take that information and use it to make a real plan for
retirement. The latest academic work suggests you may have some catching
up to do.
Kevin Hassett is director of economic policy studies at the American
Enterprise Institute.
Copyright © Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy | Contact
Us