Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



Employers Closing Door on Traditional Pensions


By Ashley Petry, www.indystar.com

July 25, 2007

 

Retirement used to be simple. After decades of hard work and loyal service, retirees received gold watches along with pensions that promised a secure, comfortable future. A study released this month shows, however, that nearly two-thirds of companies surveyed are moving away from traditional, or defined-benefit, pension plans.

In the past two years, one-third of employers offering traditional pensions have either closed them to new hires or frozen them for all participants, according to the study released by the Employee Benefit Research Institute and Mercer Human Resource Consulting. Over the next two years, another third are looking to close or freeze their pensions, the survey indicated.

"We knew this was going to happen. We just didn't know to what extent," said Jack VanDerhei, author of the study and a business professor at Temple University. "I think all of us were shocked by how big the numbers are."

The study highlights a major shift in strategy -- from defined-benefit plans such as pensions, in which employees are promised a certain level of compensation (often based on salary level and years of employment), to defined-contribution plans, typically 401(k) plans. Already, 63 percent of private-sector American workers who have a retirement benefit receive it in the form of a defined-contribution plan, according to EBRI data.

"It is data that we've confirmed for the last decade," said Nancy Griffin, state director of AARP Indiana. "Defined-benefit pensions are just going away." The bottom line is that the risk associated with investing retirement money now falls increasingly to employees, rather than employers.

But, human-resources experts say, the change doesn't come without benefits for workers."I've met plenty of folks who thought they had a pension waiting for them, and at the end of the day they didn't," said Steve Kellam, president of Quantum Human Resources and co-director for legislative matters for the Indiana State Council of the Society for Human Resource Management.

As employees change jobs more often, Kellam said, defined-contribution plans such as 401(k)s generally offer better portability. "You end up with more control and a lot more knowledge about what's there for your future," he said.
Companies that freeze pension plans generally do not leave workers empty-handed, the study showed.

 

In fact, 78 percent of companies that have frozen pension plans in the past two years also have increased their contributions to employees' defined-contribution benefits.Many of these companies also have adopted an automatic- enrollment policy for defined-contribution benefits so that employees must opt out, rather than opting in.

The study identifies several potential causes for the shift away from defined-benefit plans. One is the Pension Protection Act of 2006, which requires companies with underfunded pension plans to correct the problem -- a potentially massive expense for employers.

Several pending accounting rule changes, from the Federal Accounting Standards Board, also are causing companies to rethink pension plans.
"The volatility, if you invest in stocks, is much more likely to hit the employers' bottom line if these accounting standards are modified than under the current situation," VanDerhei said.

Those who plan to retire soon probably won't notice much change in their benefits, VanDerhei said. The real impact will be on younger workers who are just beginning to build retirement nest eggs. "The ball's going to be almost entirely in their court," he said.

 


Copyright © Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us