Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 



New Study Highlights Need for Social Security

 

By Michael A. Piekarz, Senior-Spectrum

 

June 12, 2007


A new report released by the nonpartisan National Academy of Social Insurance (NASI) revealed a simple truth – American seniors need Social Security.

Unlike many analyses of Social Security, which focus on long-term projections, the NASI study analyzes income adequacy, overall retirement security and the role Social Security will play as the older population increases in numbers — the pocketbook realities facing retirees now and into the future.

“This report lays out in dollars and cents the truth that retirees and their families know all too well — Social Security is the financial foundation keeping millions from poverty,” explained Barbara B. Kennelly, president and CEO of NASI.

“Proposing drastic entitlement cuts, just as our nation enters the largest demographic shift in our history, is short-sighted. We must refocus this debate on what needs to be done to ensure Social Security is not just preserved, but strengthened for future generations.”

Among major conclusions reached by the report was that, while today’s Social Security benefits are modest, they are also essential in providing an adequate retirement income for millions of American seniors.

The current average Social Security benefit is only $12,550 annually — one third of workers’ average earnings — but it is critical to maintaining financial stability. When Social Security benefits for a lifetime average earner retiring at age 65 today are compared to their earnings prior to retirement, the benefits replace only about 40 percent of past earnings.

The report also forecasts a significant drop in percentages. As the Social Security retirement age phases up to 67 and Medicare premiums rise at a rate faster than Social Security benefits, replacement rates for the average earner retiring at age 65 will fall to 32 percent by the year 2030.

The study also found that retirees rely heavily on Social Security and that retirement income lost from cuts in Social Security benefits would not be easily replaced with other sources of income.

“It seems like we keep saying the same thing each year, but the remarkable thing is that the numbers keep getting worse, year after year,” commented Shannon Benton, executive director of The Senior Citizens League. “Many of our lower-income seniors are going to have to choose between heating their home, prescription drugs or a sufficient supply of groceries.”

Even when other sources of income are added to Social Security benefits, retirees are left short. While the ideal income replacement goal of many retirees is 70 to 80 percent, many retired couples achieve a rate of less than 60 percent even when they rely on pensions or other assets.

Compounding the financial picture is concern regarding increasing reliance on 401(k) type plans as they replace traditional pensions because more risk is shifted from the employer to the worker. Many workers also don’t take full advantage of the available plans or make the best choices.

Despite major concerns with Social Security’s financial aspects, the system itself is surprisingly effective. “While private pensions wane and 401 (k)’s are still largely being utilized by higher-wage earners, Social Security continues to meet the description of what a successful retirement program should provide,” explained Virginia Reno, vice president of income security for NASI.

According to the experts, Social Security encompasses the features that make an effective and efficient retirement system. It is portable and covers the vast majority of workers without complex burdens on employers. It also offers protections to spouses and children, pays a monthly lifetime annuity, has inflation-indexed payments and offers disability insurance.

Policymakers discussing the recent NASI findings concluded that we should focus on solutions to meet Social Security’s long range shortfalls that don’t involve large benefit cuts or private accounts.


Copyright © Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us