UK
February 21, 2007
Protests have been growing over lost
pensions
Four people who lost all or part of their company pensions
have won their High Court case against the government.
The court ruled that the government
was wrong to completely reject the Parliamentary Ombudsman's report into
collapsed pension schemes.
The Ombudsman, Ann Abraham, said last
year that the government was guilty of maladministration.
The court decision does not oblige
the government to compensate an estimated 85,000 people for their loss
Solution sought
At Prime Minister's Question Time in
the Commons following the ruling, Conservative leader David Cameron called
on the government to sit down with opposition parties and groups
representing members of bust pension schemes to work out a compensation
package.
Prime Minister Tony Blair responded
that the government had set up a £1.8bn Financial Assistance Scheme and
although he "sympathised" with those affected, any solution had
to be "affordable".
Work and Pensions Secretary John
Hutton told the
BBC
that the government would have to give "very careful
consideration" to the ombudsman's report.
In a separate statement, David Laws,
Liberal Democrat Work and Pensions spokesman, said that unless the
government settled with the pensioners he would table an amendment to the
Pensions Bill calling for compensation.
'Big step'
The court case was brought by four
people who had lost their pensions - Bob Duncan from Jarrow, Andrew Parr
from Kent, Henry Bradley from Belfast and Tom Waugh from Staffordshire.
"It's a big step forward. But we
will have to wait and see what the government reaction is," Henry
Bradley said.
Fellow plaintiff Bob Duncan said that
he was "over the moon" about the ruling but feared the
government will appeal.
Think again
The case affects 85,000 people who
lost their pensions when the firms they worked for went bust between 1997
and 2005.
Many of these people face an
impoverished old age.
Mr Justice Bean ruled that Pensions
Minister John Hutton had no right to reject the Parliamentary Ombudsman's
report in its entirety.
The ruling means that the government
will now have to think again about whether to compensate the people who
have lost their pensions from public funds.
Ombudsman's report
The judicial review was an attempt to
compel the government to abide by the Ombudsman's rulings.
Ann Abraham published her report in
March 2006.
She said that the government's
maladministration had "caused injustice to a large number of people
who, as a result, lost the opportunity to make informed choices about
their future".
But the government has repeatedly
argued that it was not at fault and it would be too expensive to pay full
compensation.
The government has estimated the
total cost of paying compensation at £15bn, but campaigners for people
who have lost their pensions say the true cost would be much lower.
Copyright © Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy | Contact
Us