Want to support Global Action on Aging? Click below: Thanks! |
Corporations seek creative
pension solutions August 27, 2003 Critics
wonder whether cashless funding is good or bad for faltering retirement
plans U.S.
Steel is strapped for cash but still has to shore up its underfunded pension
plans. Its solution: Use land instead. Timberland, to be exact, 170,000
acres in all. That's surely thinking
outside the box, something businesses are being forced to do as they try to
cover the shortfalls in their pensions. But the creative route
isn't without risk. There is a chance plans could end up worse off. Low interest rates
combined with steep declines in the stock market in recent years have caused
a corporate pension crisis. That only affects
companies' defined benefit pension plans, which promise future pension
payments to employees. Unaffected are defined contribution plans, such as
401(k)s. A pension plan is
considered underfunded when its obligations exceed its assets by at least 10
percent. At that point, companies are required to make up the shortfall. But doing that isn't
so easy, especially given the cash crunch many companies are facing amid
weak business conditions caused by continuing lackluster economic growth. "This is creating
a real bind for any company that is struggling," said John Blossom,
president of retirement plan administrator Alliance Benefit Group in Peoria,
Ill. "While their corporate earnings are low, their pension
contributions are higher." That's led some to
seek out cashless funding alternatives. However, the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act generally prohibits non-cash contributions to
pensions from being given cash value. The Labor Department makes rare
exemptions in the interest of workers and retirees covered by a particular
plan. That's what happened
this past week when Northwest Airlines won permission to use stock from its
privately held regional affiliate, Pinnacle Airlines Corp. Northwest's pension
plans cover about 73,000 employees and retirees. The airline wants to use
the stock to cover $223 million it owes the plans for 2002. The company has
obtained a waiver to pay about $450 million in 2003 obligations over five
years. U.S. Steel, meantime,
is waiting for approval for its plan to transfer the timberland to its
pension funds. The
steelmaker said it has roughly valued the forests at $100 million. And CEO
Thomas Usher, in a conference call with analysts earlier this month, said
the trees are so young their value will "grow over time." Other cash-strapped
companies, including Navistar International, have recently used company
stock to supplement their pension contributions. All these funding
efforts may very well help resolve some corporate pension troubles, but
concerns still loom over such creativity. Take the case of
Northwest. The good news is that an independent fiduciary has been retained
to establish the fair market value of the Pinnacle stock and determine
whether it is a prudent investment for the plan. Still, Pinnacle's
primary business is operating flights for Northwest under a code-share
arrangement. That puts the pension plan in a potentially precarious position
should Northwest be hit with any financial troubles. "If something
happens to Northwest, then what?" said Joseph Macaulay, senior
consulting actuary at Diversified Investment Advisors, an investment
advisory firm. Pension experts say
the key to success with cashless alternatives is for appraisers to factor in
all that can go wrong when calculating valuations. It's also crucial to
determine who is going to take responsibility should the value tumble. Should everything go as planned, these assets could even turn out to be a boon to struggling pensions. That would surely be making good out of a bad situation. Copyright ©
2002 Global Action on Aging
|