back
Want
to support Global Action on Aging?
Click
below:
Thanks! |
|
S.
Florida retirees gather in D.C. to urge Medicare bills’ defeat
By William E. Gibson
Sun Sentinel, September 5, 2003
WASHINGTON --
Long-sought legislation to provide prescription drug coverage under Medicare
is being attacked from the left and the right as Congress gets back to work
this week, jeopardizing tenuous attempts to reach a compromise bill that
will satisfy senior citizens.
Hundreds of retired union workers rallied on Capitol Hill in the rain on
Thursday and then lobbied members of Congress to reject bills passed by the
House and Senate. They strenuously argued that both bills are a bad deal for
seniors and worse than nothing.
"Half a moldy loaf is not worth anything," said Phyllis Lapidus,
71, of Boca Raton, on behalf of thousands of New York City teachers who have
retired to Florida. "When you accept something bad, it makes it harder
to change. What we are hoping is that when these bills fail, and they
realize they have to do something, they will put together a bill that is
better."
Conservative groups also are lobbying against the legislation, complaining
that it would fail to unleash enough market competition to keep prices in
check. Both sides fear the Medicare reforms would prompt employers to drop
their drug coverage for retired workers, leaving the task and its cost to
the government.
Caught in the middle, the AARP is pressuring Congress to pass drug
legislation, but only if it does not hamper patients in the traditional
Medicare program. Representatives of the 35 million-member organization plan
to rally on Capitol Hill today, set off an explosion of telephone calls,
faxes and e-mails, and deliver more than 100,000 signatures of those who
want a drug benefit added to Medicare.
"We really want to see legislation passed this year. We've been looking
for this for more than a decade," said Michael Naylor, the AARP's chief
lobbyist in Washington. "This year both houses passed a bill, and we
want to get it over the finish line. There will not be much appetite to take
it up again if we don't bring it to fruition."
All these developments demonstrate how hard it is to make sweeping changes
in the nation's patchwork health-care system, which has left more than 41
million Americans without health insurance and millions more without drug
coverage.
Congress two months ago appeared headed for an agreement on drug coverage to
fulfill a long-standing political promise, only to hear cries of
dissatisfaction from many constituents who see the impending results as a
form of appeasement rather than substantial help.
"Too many gaps in service, with high deductibles and premiums. Too many
people who would be spending more than they were spending before," said
Hani Lipp, 61, of Deerfield Beach, who represents thousands of retired
clothing and textile workers in Florida. "We'd rather have no
legislation than the bills in there now. We need new legislation. Actually
we need universal health care that includes prescription drugs."
Legislators split
Congress, meanwhile, remains divided between many Democrats who press
for government-supervised drug coverage and many Republicans who want
Medicare to compete with the private market. This ideological divide has
made compromise difficult as members from the House and Senate try to
reconcile their bills to enact a final product.
"I wouldn't say it's unraveling. But it's been stalled for the last six
or seven weeks," said Naylor, the AARP lobbyist. "It's important
enough that we need to kick-start it and reignite the enthusiasm for this
kind of legislation."
AARP, with millions of members from both major parties, has raised concerns
of its own, particularly regarding the House version, which calls for
competition between private insurance plans and Medicare by 2010. This
provision alarms many senior citizens who fear it would lead to
"privatization" of Medicare to the disadvantage of lower-income
and less healthy patients.
"They don't have a right to destroy our Medicare program!" shouted
George Kourpias, president of the Alliance for Retired Americans, at the
union rally on Thursday.
Ironically, a coalition of conservative groups is lobbying against the
legislation from the opposite side of the political fence.
"The biggest objection is that one-third of seniors are covered by
their former employers, and [an estimated] one-third of them are going to
lose their coverage," said Donald Devine, chairman of the coalition and
former director of the Federal Employees Health Benefits plan. "These
are millions of middle-class senior citizens who are going to get dumped by
their employers from good private coverage to get less coverage by the
government."
Conservatives also are uneasy about creating a new government entitlement
program. "It's terrible public policy and foolish politics,"
Devine said. "The long-term reforms don't kick in until 2010, and who
knows what [potential] President Hillary Clinton would do with it."
Future unclear
President Bush and Republican leaders generally support the House
version and hope something like it will be passed before they face voters in
the next election.
Enactment may depend on the president and Democratic heavy-hitters, such as
Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, pressuring Congress to reach a
compromise. Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist said Thursday that he was
"absolutely confident" Congress would pass a final drug bill.
Most members are anxious to please their senior-citizen constituents,
however, and the initial response to the current bills is ominous. Passage
of drug legislation this year, which seemed so likely only a few weeks ago,
now appears highly uncertain.
Copyright ©
2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use | Privacy
Policy | Contact Us
|