Want to support Global Action on Aging? Click below: Thanks! |
Senate
Democrats Release Letter to President Bush
Office
of Senator Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts, July 8, 2003
July 8, 2003 President George W. Bush The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. Washington, DC
20501 Dear Mr. President: As the Medicare bill moves forward, we wish to share
with you our views on key issues before the conference. The Senate was able
to pass the bill with bipartisan support, and we would urge that the
conference proceed in that same bipartisan manner. We will strongly oppose a
final bill that would do more harm than good to seniors, to beneficiaries
with disabilities, and to Medicare itself. We owe it to America's senior
citizens to produce a conference report that is based on what seniors want
and need, and not the ideological bent of one political party or the other. Our support for the conference report depends on the
satisfactory resolution of the following key issues: First, the bill cannot give seniors false choices that
coerce them into leaving conventional Medicare to enroll in HMOs and private
plans. It is wrong to provide greater resources to enrich private plans
while starving Medicare in the bargain. It is wrong to legislate a vast
social experiment that would raise premiums for Medicare and victimize the
oldest and sickest senior citizens. We will oppose a conference report that
forces seniors to choose between giving up their doctor or facing higher
premiums to stay in the current Medicare program. Second, the Senate bill permits a prescription drug benefit in conventional Medicare to be provided by private plans. However, there must be a back-up Medicare plan in areas of the country in which private risk-based prescription drug plans are unwilling or unable to provide the drug benefit. In addition, there must be protections against price gouging, risk selection, and other abuses. There must be a Medicare fallback provision in the conference report that provides no less protection than in the Senate-passed bill. Third, we agree with recent statements by Republicans
and Democrats that the final bill must prevent employer plans from dropping
coverage for retirees. A bill that purports to help seniors must not result
in the loss of good retiree health coverage for as many as four million
senior citizens, as CBO estimated would happen under the House and Senate
bills. We therefore will oppose the conference report unless it provides
substantial relief from the penalty imposed under both bills on employers
who currently provide retiree health coverage. Fourth, the legislation should help all seniors, but
must give particular priority to low-income Medicare recipients. The
Medicare drug benefit must be available to all Medicare beneficiaries and
must not exclude the poorest senior citizens. We also believe that one of
the most attractive elements of the Senate-passed bill is that its drug
benefit provides low premiums, low copays, and a relaxed assets test for
about 40 percent of all Medicare recipients. The conference report must not
subject low-income beneficiaries to high out-of-pocket costs, including
costs during the coverage gap. Fifth, the conference report must encourage innovative
approaches to constraining Medicare prescription drug costs, to keep senior
citizens' premiums and co-payments as affordable as possible, including
strong provisions to assure the prompt availability of generic competitors
to brand name drugs. Finally, we will oppose any conference report that
contains controversial provisions that have nothing to do with the goal of
strengthening Medicare and providing a Medicare prescription drug benefit.
In particular, we oppose as unwise policy the addition of health savings
accounts to the bill. If $174 billion in additional resources are available,
those funds should be used to close the gaps in the Medicare prescription
drug benefit. We recognize the difficulty of the task that faces the
Medicare conferees, and we understand that hard choices and compromises will
be necessary. We want you and the conferees to be aware, however, that we
will oppose any conference report that fails to address the six fundamental
issues set forth above. We know that there is still much work to be done as
Congress works to produce a final Medicare bill for your signature. We look
forward to working closely with you to achieve this result. Sincerely, Senators Kennedy, Daschle, Stabenow, Feingold, Dodd, Akaka, Kohl, Corzine, Murray, Bayh, Carper, Bingaman, Reid, Jeffords, Hollings, Johnson, Dayton, Wyden, Cantwell, Clinton, Boxer, Durbin, Mikulski, Inouye, Rockefeller, Dorgan, Schumer, Pryor, Lautenberg, Lincoln, Levin, Kerry, Leahy, Bill Nelson, Biden, Conrad, Lieberman Copyright ©
2002 Global Action on Aging
|