back
Support Global Action on
Aging!
Thanks!
|
|
Medicare
proposal impresses lawmakers:
tri-state
delegation pitches plan in D.C.
By
Dave Dreeszen
Sioux
City Journal, May 8, 2003
WASHINGTON
-- A regional approach may be the right medicine for an ailing Medicare
reimbursement system that shortchanges metro Sioux City health care
providers, federal lawmakers told local leaders Wednesday.
Tired of waiting for a broad overhaul of Medicare, Siouxland officials
propose to designate the metro area as part of Nebraska for reimbursement
purposes. That's because the Cornhusker state ranks 24th in Medicare
spending, receiving an average of $5,367 per recipient, compared to Iowa's
last-in-the-nation $3,414.
House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle, a Republican who represents
eastern Iowa's 2nd District, was so impressed with the plan that he
jokingly said he may steal it as his own.
"You've
got a good idea," Nussle told a group of Siouxlanders during a
meeting on Capitol Hill. "Because it doesn't affect the eastern side
of the state, we're very jealous of your idea."
Several members of the tri-state congressional delegation also voiced
support.
"That makes sense," U.S. Rep. Bill Janklow, South Dakota's lone
House member, said after hearing a brief explanation of the plan.
Backers say a regional reimbursement rate is legitimate because Sioux City
hospitals and doctors treat a large number of patients from Nebraska and
South Dakota, where the average reimbursement is $5,183 per recipient.
"It would at least provide us some help and relief until (lawmakers)
overhaul the entire system," Dr. Diane Werth, a cardiologist with
Cardiovascular Associates in Sioux City, said.
The tri-state plan would require a waiver from the federal agency that
administers the Medicare program. Senate Finance Committee Charles
Grassley, R-Iowa, whose panel has jurisdiction over Medicare, said he
would make such a request to Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy
Thompson if asked by Siouxland officials.
Janklow said he also would be willing to discuss a possible waiver with
his close friend Thompson, a former Wisconsin governor who he worked with
closely during his days as South Dakota governor.
Though he likes the tri-state idea, Nussle said a system that groups Iowa
with other Midwestern states would have broader benefits for states with
below-average reimbursement levels.
"Instead of having all of these mini regions, maybe bigger regions
would be appropriate," Nussle said.
Grassley said the Medicare issue likely will resonate in the Senate
because 30 of the 50 states receive payments below the national average of
$5,994 per receipient.
"It's a big thing with a lot of my colleagues, including
myself," Grassley said in an interview.
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, said he has pushed an approach that would
increase spending for low reimbursement states like Iowa at a rate faster
than top-tier states. In five to 10 years, that would bring Iowa's average
reimbursement up to the national average, he said.
Iowa's entire congressional delegation has made fixing Medicare inequities
a priority for this session. House members have said a Medicare reform
package set for debate later this month must provide relief to Iowa
providers or they won't vote for the overall legislation.
"There's no way I can support anything that doesn't address that
issue," 4th District Rep. Tom Latham, a Republican who represented
the 5th District prior to realignment of the state's congressional
boundaries, said.
In a series of meetings on Capitol Hill this week, local health care
providers have emphasized the financial headaches caused by Iowa's
last-in-the-nation Medicare ranking.
Peter Makowski, chief executive officer of Mercy Medical Center -- Sioux
City, noted Medicare accounts for 54 percent of the hospital's revenue.
But because the federal payments fail to cover the actual costs, Mercy is
forced to write off 32 cents of every dollar, he said.
"We lose money every time we treat a Medicare patient," Makowski
said.
But Janklow pointed out most every Republican and Democrat he has talked
to on Capitol Hill has been unsympathetic to the hospitals' arguments,
suggesting the institutions were getting by just fine financially.
"Nobody buys the accounting because they know it's not legit,"
Janklow told Makowski.
Copyright
© 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use | Privacy
Policy | Contact Us
|