Want to support Global Action on Aging? Click below: Thanks! |
Ohio fails to adapt to seniors' new needs
By:
Susan Jaffe March 17, 2003 Ohio's approach
to caring for the elderly is stuck in a time warp. Growing old in
America has radically changed. More elderly Ohioans are living healthier,
longer lives than ever before. Fewer are entering nursing homes, where the
resident population declined by about 100,000 in the past decade. Yet the state
still spends millions of dollars more every year for fewer people in nursing
homes as if nothing has changed. Ohio even pays part of the cost to maintain
an estimated 12,700 empty beds. Around-the-clock
nursing home care is the most expensive form of long-term care for the
elderly, and Ohio spent $2.46 billion on it last year. Such care consumed
more than a third of the state's Medicaid budget. It's a habit
the state can no longer afford, says Gov. Bob Taft, who wants to freeze
payments to nursing homes that care for residents covered by Medicaid, the
government's health insurance program for low-income families and
individuals. State officials
as well as seniors' advocates argue that as long as nursing homes get nearly
all of the state's long-term-care dollars, there will be little money left
for cheaper alternatives, and no place else to go. The issue of
whether to curb nursing home costs comes at a time when the homes are
changing their mission. "The image
used to be that a nursing home was the last home for the aged, where you
went to die," says Suzanne Kunkel, director of the Scripps Gerontology
Center at Miami University in Oxford, Ohio. "It was pretty much your
last stop, but now people go there and leave." About 30
percent of nursing home residents are discharged within three months, and 60
percent leave within six months, Kunkel said. Many enter
nursing homes to get back on their feet after a hospital stay, especially
since Medicare, which provides health insurance for 40 million older
Americans, pays for only a limited number of days in a hospital. Medicare
also covers certain nursing home stays following hospitalization, but only
up to 100 days. Medicaid covers longer periods for those poor residents who
are eligible. When patients
aren't ready to go home, nursing homes can fill the gap in care. "We're
seeing better health practices, healthier older people, and it is now
perfectly reasonable to expect that even someone in their 70s can recover
fully from surgery," Kunkel said. The number of
elderly Ohioans has increased 7.6 percent to an estimated 1.51 million since
1990. Ellieree Goff
of Cleveland spent four weeks in physical therapy at Willow Park Skilled
Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, a 209-bed facility in Warrensville
Heights, after a week at University Hospitals. She was recovering from a
mild heart attack. She returned home last month, a day after her 97th
birthday. When Steven
Raichilson became administrator of Menorah Park Center for Senior Living in
Beachwood in 1987, the average stay for a resident was four years. These
days, they stay about half as long. "Our
average age is 86, and our oldest is 103," said Raichilson. Now is not the
time to freeze nursing home payments, nursing home operators argue. The
people who eventually need nursing home care are coming in with more chronic
ailments and need more expensive care. At the Eliza
Bryant Village nursing home in Cleveland, the cost of care already exceeds
reimbursement by about $15 a day for each of their 100 residents. "That's
$1,500 a day. We're falling behind every year," at a time when it's
tough to raise money, said executive director Harvey Shankman. Eliza Bryant
and Menorah Park are nonprofit facilities. But even
for-profit facilities such as Willow Park in Cleveland are having problems
keeping up with operating expenses. Willow Park is part of an 800-bed chain
of profit-making facilities in Northeast Ohio owned by Royal Manor Group. "The
governor should find other ways to balance the budget, instead of taking
money from the elderly," said Willow Park administrator Chris Ayewoh. Nursing home
administrators argue that a freeze in payments simply isn't realistic. "The
people who sell us goods and services don't freeze their prices to us,"
said Raichilson. "If you don't have money to pay staff, people aren't
going to work for you. "People in
Ohio nursing homes have worked in Ohio for 50 or 60 years, and they deserve
adequate care. They are not a political ball to be thrown back and
forth." Since 1993,
Ohio's payments for Medicaid residents in nursing homes jumped 75 percent -
or 69 percent including federal matching money - while the number of
residents dropped 4.5 percent. Taft wants to
change a formula enshrined in state law that has guaranteed annual raises in
Medicaid reimbursements to the state's nearly 1,000 nursing homes. The worst-rated
nursing homes are paid the same as the best. For-profit institutions are
paid the same as those that don't make a profit. The formula also covers
"indirect costs" like advertising and lobbying. It even pays for
building-wide expenses like utilities, regardless of the nursing home's
occupancy rate or empty beds. "Nursing
homes don't have the same incentives [as hospitals] to re-examine
costs," said Barbara Edwards, deputy director of the Ohio Department of
Job & Family Services, which runs the state's Medicaid program. State officials
acknowledge the payment system is flawed. "If we had
to start from scratch, we would design a new system, where the money would
follow people and challenge consumers," said Edwards. "We are
creating an artificial market which has kept [nursing home] utilization as
high as it is because we don't fund alternatives." Jane Taylor,
executive director of the Ohio Association of Area Agencies on Aging, said
Ohio's system should be flipped around so that nursing homes are just one of
several choices. That's what Oregon does. "They
invest in foster homes, assisted living and home care. They tried to put
some balance in the system," she said. But it's
difficult to support alternatives, when most of the state's money is
committed - by law - to nursing homes, said Taylor. Even if the
Taft administration persuades the General Assembly to support the governor's
freeze, saving the state $223 million, the money won't be spent on other
kinds of long-term care. It will go to close a $3 billion gap in next year's
budget. The most
popular Medicaid-supported alternative is the state's Passport program,
which provides home health care to 25,000 Ohioans a year. It is one-fifth
the cost of institutional care and consumes about 1 percent of Medicaid
spending. Budget
pressures forced Taft to cut $1.8 million from Passport almost two weeks
ago, and even his proposed increase for the program in the next budget falls
short of the demand. The Department
of Aging, which operates the program, estimates that 150 people a month will
be turned away. "There is little question we will have waiting
lists," said department spokesman Steve Proctor. People who
can't wait or make other arrangements can enter a nursing home. If 104
elderly Ohioans on Medicaid stay in a nursing home for a year, the cost to
the state will consume the $1.8 million savings. If 1,000 people end up in
nursing homes, that would cost the state as much as $17.2 million. There is more
at stake in the current debate than payments to nursing homes. Advocates for
seniors say it is also about survival of alternatives like Passport or PACE,
the Program for All-Inclusive Care, a Medicare HMO that provides adult day
care for about 400 people in Cleveland Heights and Cincinnati. There will
always be a need for the intensive care that nursing homes provide, said
Eric Fingerhut, a Cleveland Democrat who has advocated alternatives to
nursing homes. "The real
reform is seeing to it that people only end up in nursing homes when they
absolutely have to have that level of care and not a minute before," he
said. For Ellieree
Goff, there's no place like home. "I love to
work in the yard," said Goff, who is already planning her garden.
"If the good Lord gives me the strength, I will." Copyright ©
2002 Global Action on Aging
|