Support Global Action on Aging! Thanks! |
Investors Find New Ways to Put Pension Money Into Real Estate By
Ray, A. Smith Investors are discovering ways to
buy bigger and more expensive properties with their individual 401(k)
retirement plans. Last year, tax laws allowing
individuals to set up single-participant 401(k) plans went into effect, and
a number of firms began to offer services allowing these plans to invest in
real estate, an activity single-participant IRA plans had long been doing.
The laws also increased the limits on contributions to 401(k) plans and
individual retirement accounts. But because the maximum investors can put
into 401(k) plans is $40,000 a year, and $3,000 for IRAs, combined with
tight restrictions on obtaining mortgages, many properties are beyond the
financial reach of solo pension plans. Now, accountants, tax attorneys
and investors have come up with some creative ways to expand the range of
properties the plans can buy -- to include, for example, a high-end mall or
even a Class A office building in a major city. Investors need to know what
they're getting into, though, because these alternative methods can be quite
complex, and, ultimately, hard to unwind. So consulting a tax attorney is
highly recommended, especially since this area of investing involves the
federal tax code. Pooling Resources One strategy, suggested in the
recent book "Real Estate Loopholes: Secrets of Successful Real Estate
Investing," is pooling pension plans to buy properties. Two or more
investors with so-called self-directed plans could, for example, form a
limited partnership or a limited liability company to purchase the property. Diane Kennedy, a certified public
accountant in Phoenix and co-author of the book, says investors in
single-participant pension plans can also buy shares or interests in limited
partnerships that acquire commercial real estate. A limited partnership is
made up of limited partners and a general partner. Interests, or shares, in
real estate are sold through brokers or financial dealers. Another option:
forming a partnership with a private investor who will manage the property. In each case, a third-party
custodian -- such as Equity Trust Co. in Elyria, Ohio, or Sterling Trust
Co., of Waco, Texas -- would handle all the transactions, including
reviewing and signing any documents, forwarding funds to the seller and
reporting to the Internal Revenue Service. The custodian also holds the
interests in the limited partnership on the behalf of investors. Ms. Kennedy
suggests that people who don't know others who want to pool should talk to
their accountants and attorneys to see if they have clients who are
interested in pooling plans. "The beauty of this is that
the profits [generated from rent] go into your pension account," says
Garrett Sutton, an attorney in Reno, Nev., and Ms. Kennedy's co-author.
"And later when it's sold, the profit goes into the pension account.
You're really leveraging your money that way." Things to Consider There are some caveats to
consider. Management fees for the party running the property can add up.
What's more, investors have to divvy up the income generated from rent. "You get just a
proportionate share of the profits" because the investor is sharing
ownership with other parties, says Richard Desich Jr., vice president of
Equity Trust. Moreover, it isn't easy to get
out of a partnership or to sell an interest. "Those are usually fairly
illiquid investments," meaning they are hard to convert into cash, says
Gary C. Pokrant, tax principal with Reznick Fedder & Silverman P.C. in
Bethesda, Md. Partnership structures are also complicated by the fact that
the partners or owners typically all have to agree on important decisions
related to the property. A solo-plan participant choosing to invest in real estate faces risks typical of most landlords: the loss of a tenant or tenants and tenant defaults. The crucial difference is that for individuals, the loss of income from such events will hurt their retirement money. A bad bet could wipe out retirement savings. Copyright ©
2002 Global Action on Aging
|