back

 

Support Global Action on Aging!

Thanks!

Bush Quietly Abandons Retirement-Savings Plan

By John D. McKinnon
The Wall Street Journal, May 18, 2003

WASHINGTON - President Bush is poised to win sweeping changes in the U.S. tax system, but not the top-to-bottom rewrite of retirement-savings incentives the White House was seeking.

The president's proposal called for switching Americans from the dizzying array of tax-advantaged plans to a simplified system consisting of two basic vehicles: lifetime savings accounts and retirement savings accounts. But the plan was quietly abandoned soon after its splashy release with the federal budget.

The proposal would have worked remarkable changes in federal tax policy, potentially using tax breaks to encourage far more savings. It also would have weaned most Americans away from current plans that provide up-front deductions, and given them tax-free distributions from their plans after retirement instead, as Roth IRA's now do.

Some analysts say the proposal would have put the U.S. well down the road toward taxing individuals' consumption instead of income, a basic turnabout in the tax system.

But few in the White House realized the plan's scope. It was developed under ousted Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill, without much input from White House political advisers.

When details emerged, some senior White House officials said they were shocked.

The plan also stirred concern among groups that depend on the current employer-provided system, such as some financial-services firms and benefits planners.

As a result, administration officials quickly signaled they didn't intend to push the issue this year.

The outlook for most other pension-related proposals also is clouded for the remainder of this year, in part because the big tax-cut bill will drain away resources, pension experts say. Potentially costly expansions of retirement-contribution limits face an uphill battle, for example.

And post-Enron proposals to strengthen employee protections in 401(k) plans appear to be slipping as a priority. Last week, the House again passed a bill to give employees more control over their plans, but the issue appears likely to die in the Senate, as it did last year.


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us