Support Global Action on Aging! Thanks! |
Government workers suing over pensions By Barb Pacholik Regina Leader Post, April 30 2003 More than $100 million is at stake
in a class-action lawsuit launched on behalf of 10,000 members in an
underfunded Saskatchewan government pension plan. Regina lawyer Gord Kuski, who
represents the plaintiffs, said pensions are being paid, but there's no
money to enhance the benefits. "Without appropriate indexing, meaning
cost of living increases, each pensioner's ability to make ends meet erodes
as each year passes. So they're on a very slippery slope right now." Finance Department spokesman Mike
Woods said the government is meeting its obligations. "All pensioners are receiving
the benefits to which they are entitled," he said. Woods declined
further comment while the lawsuit is outstanding. The first step will be to ask a
judge to certify the claim as a class action, meaning the issues need only
be tried once since they are common to all the potential plaintiffs. At issue is the Public Service
Superannuation Plan (PSSP), which has 8,000 members drawing pensions and
about 2,100 still working who will be entitled to a pension on retirement. The lawsuit, filed recently with
Court of Queen's Bench in Regina, claims the government has contributed only
$2.8 million to the PSSP, compared to more than $100 million contributed by
civil servants. "It was an obligation of the
government to make matching contributions to the plan," the lawsuit
contends. A statement of claim, which
launches a suit, contains allegations expected to be proven in court. A statement of defence, rebutting
the claims, has not yet been filed. Kuski, who handled a multi-million
dollar battle for the Regina police over its pension plan, said the PSSP has
"a significant unfunded liability that the government uses for a
justification in not enhancing pension benefits." An unfunded liability occurs when
commitments exceed the projected assets. "They're saying, 'the
cupboards bare.' And we're saying, 'well, if the cupboards bare, it's your
fault.' " In a report to the legislature's
public accounts committee in March 2001, Finance Department officials
admitted the plan's unfunded liability was an estimated $1.2 billion. The government created the PSSP in
1927. It was replaced 50 years later,
and employees had the option of moving into a new plan or remaining in the
PSSP. PSSP members accuse the government
of breaching its obligation by failing to match employee contributions and
establishing a separate pension fund. "They just received the employees
contributions, put it into their general revenues, and then took on itself
an obligation to pay the pensions when they became payable -- again out of
the general revenues," Kuski said. The suit contends the plan was
hurt financially by government actions. When the plan was replaced, no new
employees were paying into it. Also "downsizing" meant employees
were retiring and collecting benefits sooner, but also paying less into the
plan. The lawsuit also takes the
province to task for allegedly "erroneous and misleading reports."
The PSSP members aren't alone in that criticism. At a 2001 public accounts
committee meeting, provincial auditor's staff said the government wasn't
recording all the costs related to the pension funds or their unfunded
liability in its general revenue fund financial statements. "You need to have some way to
tell people how you're going to manage the cash flows for this in the
future. This is debt just like any other debt," provincial auditor Fred
Wendel said Monday. At that 2001 meeting, finance
officials maintained liabilities in the PSSP and a teachers' pension fund
would be eliminated in 60 years, and in the meantime, payments are
"manageable and affordable." Copyright ©
2002 Global Action on Aging
|