![]() |
||||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Some related articles :BoE Warns on Pension Uncertainty (July 22, 2002) |
![]() |
Bleak Outlook for Pensioners at Mercy of Volatile Markets By:
David Turner
Britain's ageing population will place more people at
the mercy of volatile financial markets - which could leave them with much
lower-than-expected pensions, according to a paper published by a Bank of
England economist. The warning came as UK stocks fell sharply again,
sliding 5 per cent on the day to a six-year low. The paper, by economist Garry Young, says the growth in the number of people exposed to such volatility raises the risks to economic and financial stability, by making it more likely that large numbers will suffer when a financial shock hits the system. Moreover, poor returns for pensioners could damage
the broader economy further if they encouraged workers worried about their
retirement income to spend less. His paper points out that ageing populations have
encouraged the shift from public to private provision for old age,
increasing the proportion of retired people "exposed to risks to
market prices and rates of return". "Recent experience with endowment mortgages emphasizes
that the returns on long-term investments can turn out to be substantially
different to expectations," the paper says. It also makes clear that the golden age of pensions,
when saving for retirement seemed relatively painless, is over. It warns
that "the current generation of pensioners has benefited from
extraordinarily high asset returns, which are unlikely to be
repeated". The paper points out also that whereas the first generations to live to an advanced age benefited from the accumulated capital of previous generations, later generations would be left less money by their long-lived predecessors. Neil Churchill of Age Concern said: "The basic
state pension should act as a shield against investment volatility by
providing basic living expenses. At the moment it does not." The paper also highlighted the risk that investment
could be hit by a fall in the rate of saving, as people retire and turn
instead to consumption. A large change in capital accumulation would slow
down output growth, warns the paper. Lower output growth would mean less tax revenue, and
the need for higher tax rates if future governments plan to increase
spending on public services on the same ambitious scale outlined in last
week's spending review. FAIR USE NOTICE: This page contains copyrighted material the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Global Action on Aging distributes this material without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. We believe this constitutes a fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in 17 U.S.C ยง 107. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
|