|
Women
question early retirement When
the pioneers of New China formulated rules al-lowing women to retire five
years ahead of their male colleagues out of concern for their health, they
did not foresee that their goodwill would be resented by many women
decades later.
The
policy has been challenged by women, particularly white-collar
professionals and civil servants, who are increasingly sceptical about the
fairness of the rules of yesteryear. Times have changed, they argue, and
technology and efficiency have relieved more and more people from hard
physical labour. So the different retirement ages for men and women appear
to discriminate against women. "I'd
like to work till the age of 60," says Gui, a female retiree who used
to be a technician with a research institution in "I
was forced to retire at an age when I could have done better than ever
before. My children had grown up and had their own careers, which rid me
of family commitments. I'm still in good health. But what can I do? That's
the rule," grumbles the woman, who did not want to give her full
name. The
discrepancy in retiring ages for women and men, stipulated in the
Provisional Regulation on Civil Servants issued in 1993 and other
government rulings, came under heavy attack from delegates to the Ninth
Chinese Women's National Congress in August. "The
regulation was formulated shortly after New China was founded in 1949, for
the sake of alleviating women's family burden of bearing and rearing at
least two children," says Xia Yinlan, vice-chairperson of China
Society of Marriage and Family Studies. "Indeed it was out of care
for women as their workload could be heavy in those days. But now, the
one-child policy has eased their family burden. To let these people,
mostly well-educated, retire at 55 is actually a waste of social
resources."
Generally
speaking, a woman completes undergraduate study at about 23, and will
spend approximately three years each for a masters and a doctorate degree.
A highly educated woman can barely work for 30 years if she has to retire
at 55. As
it has been inscribed in China's Constitution that "men and women
enjoy equal rights," Xia, who is also a professor at China University
of Politics and Law, says the regulation setting different retiring ages
for men and women is "unconstitutional" and runs contrary to the
government commitment to regarding "equality between men and
women" as a basic State policy. Tan
Lin, director of Women's Studies Institute of the All-China Women's
Federation, is more explicit. "Men
and women have the equal right to work. However, due to the decree of
early retirement for women, women become losers in the on-going government
restructuring, for they are normally excluded from consideration for
further promotion at county-level governments when they reach 40, although
in cities the age could be extended to 50. Thus women have fewer
opportunities in terms of on-job training, career development and
promotion." She
notes that scarce women representation in the country's senior leadership
has much to do with their early retirement. Early
retirement also affects the pension and, thus, income for women, as the
proportion of pension largely depends on the length of service and
position at retirement. "Few
women can receive the maximum pension at the compulsory retirement
age," says Tan Lin. Generally, only those with 35 years or longer of
service are entitled to the maximum pension. But a study conducted by
Tan's institute shows that the average length of service for female civil
servants in A
lower pension would thus compromise the quality of life for women in view
of their average 73 years of life expectancy, which is four years longer
than men. Huang
Rongsheng, an executive with Ever
since the regulation was released, the early retirement age for female
civil servants has become an issue of controversy. In the past few years,
more than 1,500 proposals have been tabled at the annual sessions of the
National People's Congress and the Chinese People's Political Consultative
Conference. "Early
retirement means less income and a waste of talent," acknowledges
Yang Peiying, a senior official with the Ministry of Personnel who is in
charge of salary, welfare and retirement. Xia
Yinlan, who is on the expert team for the revision of the Law on the
Protection of Women's Rights and Interests, reveals that it's likely to
incorporate a specific provision on the same retirement age for men and
women. But
not all people favour the equal-age lobbying. An
aged man living in Many
are worried that extending women's service might aggravate the
already-grim unemployment situation. "If
the government allows women to work for another five or 10 years, it's
like adding frost to snow for current unemployment (officially at 4.5 per
cent)," says Pan Jintang, professor with the School of Labour
Relations and Human Resources at the Renmin University of China. This
view, however, does not hold water, says Feng Yuan, a senior editor with
China Women's News, a daily newspaper on and for women. "If job
vacancies are needed for the young, then both men and women can retire
before 60," she says. "It's unfair to have just one gender make
the sacrifice." But
women other than civil servants may not be that eager to retire late, as
Professor Pan cautions that female workers engaged in labour-intensive
industries or companies running in the red might not be as keen to work
longer as their peers in the civil service. "I
only wish to retire as early as possible as long as my pension is
guaranteed," says a 47-year-old female cotton spinner. For
many women in this category, late retirement does not make any sense. Professor
Xia Yinlan explains that in revising the law on women's rights and
interests, "our focus now is the equal rights in the legal form.
First, rules and regulations based on law should guarantee women enjoy the
right of retiring at the same age with men. Whether women exercise the
right is up to them. "Both
women's equal rights and their personal choices will be taken into
consideration in the revision. Women should be able to retire at the same
age as men when their capacity and health permit and choose early
retirement if they wish," she says. Yang
Dawen, professor with the
Nonetheless,
Yang, who was on the drafting team for the 1992 Law on the Protection of
Women's Rights and Interests, draws attention to the so-called
"absolute equal treatment to man and woman," saying "the
unequal social status between men and women over the years cannot be
eliminated overnight. Sometimes, women need to be given special protection
before achieving equality." "This
is not discrimination. On the contrary, a blind cry for equality without
reference to social conditions would add difficulty to the realization of
women's rights," he notes. However
reasonable the argument sounds, Xia Yinlan observes: "Any revision of
law needs to go through certain procedures and takes time." Early
retirement: pros and cons 'I
was forced to retire at an age when I could have done better than ever
before. My children had grown up and had their own careers, which rid me
of family commitments. I'm still in good health.' 'Early
retirement means less income and a waste of talent.' 'Women
become losers in the on-going government restructuring, for they are
normally excluded from consideration for further promotion at county-level
governments when they reach 40...' 'If
the government allows women to work for another five or 10 years, it's
like adding frost to snow for current unemployment.' --FENG YUAN, a senior editor with China Women's News
Copyright
© 2002 Global Action on Aging |