
back

|
 |
A parent's
loss
By
Dr. Radha Shankar
The
Hindu Times, March 11, 2001

HER sculpted but finely wrinkled face revealed little emotion; the
voice was tightly controlled; the tremors of her hands, and the small
shudders that shook her said it all. She was 65-years- old and was
discussing the death of her 45-five-year-old son that had taken place two
years ago. Every detail was recounted with painful clarity. Dinner had
finished, as always, at 7-30 p.m. They had been watching television. The
telephone rang, and the news was broken with brutal frankness. Her first
son had died, an hour ago.
The tremors and shudders were clearly in evidence. "My younger son
scolds me. He says that it is more than two years since his brother left
us, and that I should stop talking about this to every person I meet. I
really don't want to, but the words seem to come out on their own. Can you
give me something that will make me sleep at night? I can manage in the
daytime, but in the stillness of the night, I am flooded with the happy
memories of his growing up. And then I realise, that I am left only with
those memories, and nothing else."
Mrs. A had been referred to me by her physician who was puzzled by her
many complaints, and his inability to find anything seriously wrong with
her.
Mr. V was in his early 70s. Persistent problems with his sleep was why
his general practitioner referred him to me. "I am fine, doctor"
were his opening remarks. "My wife feels that I am not sleeping
enough, and you know how women are." Behind the jocular facade, the
tense body language conveyed the truth. His 35-year- old daughter had died
in the United States of leukemia.
"I am no stranger to death," he said. "My parents,
uncles, aunts. But they were all older, and I could accept their death as
an inevitability." He half smiled. "Strangely enough, I went for
some pre retirement workshops so as to mentally prepare myself for
retirement and old age. "But nothing can prepare you for this. In
spite of my increasing physical frailty, I felt that I was strong because
of my children. But when I lost my child, it was as if I been bled
completely, leaving me hollow and empty inside. To lose your child is the
final denouement for an elderly parent."
Mr. And Mrs. V lived alone with only the bi-weekly telephone calls from
their two other children in the U.S., and the slow ticking of the clock to
keep them company. Mr. V was obviously struggling with his unresolved
grief.
The contrast between Mr. V and Mrs. A could not be more striking. Mr. V
was urbane, sophisticated, the much travelled city dweller. Mrs. A was
rustic, earthy, living in the ancestral home of her husband, tucked away
in small town in Tamil Nadu. Unknown to each other, they were united with
the searing pain of long, weary sleepless nights. They were bonded in
their futile quest for answers to two questions that never seemed to leave
their minds: Why was my child taken away? What did I do to suffer this
loss in my old age?
Both stories had a frightening similarity about them. In the period
immediately following the bereavement, their families had rallied around
them. However, soon thereafter, the younger members of the family left for
their respective homes. The grieving elders were left behind, alone and
defenceless. Mr. V and Mrs. A were merely two old people unable to cope
with their loss, with no one to comfort them other than their equally
bewildered spouses.
To mental health professionals, they represent much more than routine
case histories or "a difficult-to-find-a-solution human interest
story." They are an ominous indicator of the psychological problems
likely to be faced by the elderly as the social fabric and demography of
urban India undergoes rapid changes.
It can be argued that dealing with death is one of the tasks of the
elderly. Coming to terms with the death of adult children is a less
explored and qualitatively different issue. One for which solutions are
hard to come by.
Since death is the only certainty in life, the process of grieving, or
coping with death, is regarded a "normal response". Most people
go through stages of shock, sadness, searching for the loved one, and
finally reach mental stability in six months when they come to terms with
their loss, but may grieve especially at anniversaries. When the grieving
process is delayed, prolonged or distorted, it is known as abnormal grief.
In these situations, the survivors fail to accept the finality of the
loss, and are unable to rebuild their lives after the event. This occurs
in about 15 per cent of cases.
Abnormal grieving often occurs in situations when the death is
unnatural (suicide, homicide or accidental), or when the death is
premature, or occurs at an inappropriate time in the life cycle of the
human being. People with poor social support, emotional or health
problems, are regarded as more vulnerable to abnormal grieving.
Old age is a period potentially fraught with several stresses. Physical
frailty, lack of economic security, reversal of parental roles and
increasing emotional dependence on the younger generation often tax the
capacity of the elderly to cope. In these circumstances, the unnatural and
premature death of one's adult offspring is often too heavy a burden to
bear.
In addition to mourning the loss of a child, the elderly may have to
deal with renewed fears of financial and emotional insecurity, and having
to adjust to change in living circumstances. For some senior citizens, the
well-being of the grandchildren becomes a source of great worry, coupled
with the belief that they are too frail to impact the situation. An
untimely demise, especially in the autumn of one's life, may generate
tremendous despair in parents because of the uncertainty related to the
perpetuation of one's vamsham (family name).
Having to confront and deal with one's own mortality is likely to be an
unstated but prime concern for many elders, and they may lament the loss
of their offspring who is needed to perform the last rites for them. At
all ages, an individual deals with the death of a loved one in the belief
that the future holds promise for better times. For many elderly, the
ominous ticking of the clock means that they do not have the luxury of
time or expectations of the future. In modern times, the bereaved elderly
have become vulnerable not only because of the loss of traditional
supports like a joint family and close knit neighbourhoods, but also
erosion of traditional and religious beliefs.
A striking example of this is the progressive shortening of mourning
rituals. While the spiritual sanctity of these rituals is best left to
religious leaders, it is now recognised that these rituals provide some
form of psychological support by bringing the family together for a
defined period of time. However, today, they have become perfunctory. This
also means that an important source of comfort and support for the elderly
(especially those who are religious minded) is being diminished.
In the absence of strong emotional and social support, some often fail
to recover. The story of Mr. K is a graphic illustration. A retired
government official, in his mid 60s, he was enjoying his retirement, when
his eldest son died in an accident. Mr. K was unable to summon the
strength to perform the funeral rites. Soon, his health began to
deteriorate rapidly. His other son was settled in England, his daughter
was concerned and loving, but had to cater to the needs of her own family.
A few days after his son's first death anniversary , Mr. K. suffered a
stroke. The fortnightly phone calls from his son and occasional visits
from his daughter were not incentives enough for Mr. K to pull himself out
of his depression and continue to meet the challenges of living.
Do all senior citizens experience abnormal or distorted grieving?
Although the death of a progeny is a hard loss to bear, many senior
citizens cope with the situation admirably, often serving as a source of
strength to the middle-aged and younger survivors. These elders
reconstitute the remainder of their lives with a wide variety of coping
mechanisms. These include drawing strength from spiritual and religious
sources, purposeful activity within the limits of their physical ability,
reasserting their moral authority as the elder in the family and providing
courage to their younger relatives.
There are no simple solutions for helping the elderly cope with losses
because they could experience a wide range of emotional and behavioural
responses, ranging from florid depression to carefully masked stoicism.
And there are no ready-made answers to dealing with this challenging but
most basic of human emotions.
The first step in providing assistance is to recognise their
vulnerability, and attempt to support them actively, not just immediately
following the loss but well after that. It is also important to
acknowledge the right of the elderly to mourn, and not expect them to snap
out of it as quickly as do younger people. However, this should be
moderated by efforts towards resumption of a normal routine, and
encouraging the person to reassert his or her moral authority as the
senior in the family.
Younger family members are often alternately amused and concerned about
the proclivity of the elderly to talk about the past. In the context of
bereavement, this is seen as a morbid preoccupation with the deceased.
Allowing the person to reminiscence about the dead child has a soothing
effect, and should not be regarded as abnormal. But it should not become
the predominant activity.
Focussing on the strengths of the elderly and encouraging them to draw
from their experience and guiding them to assist a more needy person helps
mitigate their brooding about the injustice of fate.
As a psychiatrist, my efforts to deliver optimal care and support to
elderly citizens seeking assistance to deal with such trauma has often
represented a professional challenge. Medical training equips us to
prescribe antidepressant medication, provide counselling and supportive
therapy and help people get on with the business of living. Many of these
interventions are effective, and it is important for families and
caregivers to initiate the process of seeking professional assistance as
soon as they recognise that the person is suffering from abnormal
grieving.
However, I am conscious of the limitations of these medical approaches,
which may not always help create a meaning and purpose in life for the
bereaved. This can result only through societal interventions that
emphasise not the frailty but the dignity of senior citizens and the
recognition that there are several stakeholders in the well-being of our
elderly. These could include the immediate family, neighbours, social
service organisations, religious leaders and the younger generation.
Younger people have a curiously ambivalent attitude towards death and
dying. On the one hand, life after death, the right to life, and the right
to choose your manner of dying are topics for heated academic discussions
amongst the young intelligentsia. Paradoxically, this passionate rhetoric
coexists comfortably with a striking emotional detachment, because to most
of the young and the middle-aged, death seems so far away. For the
elderly, there is no comfort in rhetoric or distance. Death and dying are
very real and "alive" issues. So, in a very practical sense, it
is the elderly themselves who can help us identify the different processes
that bring equanimity and solace to them.
Copyright © 2002 Global
Action on Aging
Terms of Use | Privacy
Policy | Contact Us |