Liberal Governor's Request for Medicaid Cuts Puts Democrats in Tough
Spot
By
Julian Pecquet, The Hill
July 20, 2011
President
Obama and congressional Democrats have been put in a
tough spot by California Gov. Jerry Brown’s (D) request to cut Medicaid
spending 10 percent.
Brown
says
he needs to make the cuts to the state Medicaid program, known as
Medi-Cal, to ease his state’s severe budget woes. But advocates say
cuts of
that size would be devastating to California's most vulnerable
residents.
The
federal Centers for Medicare
and Medicaid Services (CMS) — and, by extension, the White House — must
choose
between helping a first-term Democratic governor who has been a leader
on
healthcare reform and signing off on a policy that advocates say would
be devastating
to people with disabilities.
CMS
also
has to weigh the potential fallout from the decision, since giving
California carte blanche to make Medicaid cuts could open the
floodgates for
other states to make similar requests.
Brown's
request
has sparked an outcry from some members of his state's congressional
delegation, with Rep. Dennis Cardoza (D-Calif.) leading the fight to
protect
the funding for people with intellectual and developmental disabilities.
"If
the proposed cuts in the
Medi-Cal rate go through," Cardoza recently wrote to
CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, "I am deeply concerned that [some]
providers [of services for the disabled] will have no option other than
to
close their facilities."
The
debate
comes as California seeks to plug a $26.6 billion budget gap, the worst
of the 50 states. To get there, the state last month adopted a
bare-bones
budget for 2011-2012 that slashes Medicaid by about $1.4 billion.
In
a June 27 letter to
the president, Brown urged Obama to approve the state's request.
"California
has
enacted huge and extraordinarily painful spending cuts to close our
multibillion-dollar
budget gap," Brown wrote. "We did our part to reduce state and
federal Medicaid spending by eliminating optional benefits, reducing
provider
payments and requiring beneficiary cost sharing."
The
letter
asked the president to reject other cuts that are reportedly on the
table as part of the debt-ceiling talks, including proposals to bar
states from
taxing Medicaid providers and cutting Medicaid reimbursements at the
federal
level.
California
needs
CMS to approve the cuts because the federal government pays a portion
of
states' Medicaid costs. The state made its formal State Plan Amendment
request
on June 30 — the same day that the more than $10 billion in extra
Medicaid
dollars provided to the state by the 2009 Recovery Act dried up.
Norman
Williams,
a spokesman for the California Department of Healthcare Services,
said Medicaid is the state's second highest expenditure, and cutting it
"has to be part of the budget solution."
The
10
percent cut, Williams added, isn't trying to target any specific
population,
but rather aims to protect the solvency of a Medicaid program more than
7.5
million people rely on.
The
proposed cuts include a 10
percent reduction in Medicaid payments to hospitals,
physicians,
nursing facilities and other providers that Brown says would
save $623.4 million in 2011-12. Cardoza and others are worried about
the
potential impact on intermediate care facilities for the mentally
disabled,
which rely on Medicaid for all their funding.
The
cuts
would affect about 7,000 residents at 1,000 facilities statewide, but
advocates say about 150 are likely to close over the next 18 months if
the cuts
go through. Jim Gomez, CEO of the nursing-home lobby group California
Association of Health Facilities, said the homes most at risk are in
the San
Francisco Bay Area and the Central Valley.
Besides
Cardoza,
several other Central Valley lawmakers have facilities that could be
forced to close, leaving residents with few or no options. These
include House
Republican Whip Kevin McCarthy, whose office did not respond to
requests for
comment.
A
spokeswoman for Cardoza said the
lawmaker would “certainly welcome Rep. McCarthy’s support on this
issue, but
due to time constraints with the pending decision with CMS, Rep.
Cardoza moved
forward with the letter in an effort to get immediate action on this
issue.”
Gomez
said
many of the residents have been in the five- or six-bed homes for years
with the same fellow patients and caregivers. Forcing them to move into
larger
regional centers or skilled nursing facilities, as some have proposed,
would be
"a huge change in their life."
"You
have
to understand that in this population, many of them have spent 10, 20
years in the same home," Gomez said. "These residents would have to be
placed somewhere else, and that would break up a family situation."
Gomez
warned
that his group, which is already suing California over a 2009 rate
freeze, might expand its lawsuit to cover the 10 percent cut if CMS
approves
it. Cardoza hinted as much in his letter.
Moving
the residents, he wrote, "could relegate them to a
more restrictive environment, in violation of [their] rights."
More
Information on US Social Security Issues
More Information on US
Private Pension Issues
More Information on Trade
Unions and Pension Issues
Copyright © Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use
| Privacy Policy
| Contact Us
|