Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

DonateNow

Abuse case alarms families of elderly

By Matt Leingang
Democrat and Chronicle, June 8, 2003

Every day that Deedie Littrell visited her 75-year-old mother at an adult home in suburban Rochester, she passed through the halls of a beautifully appointed facility designed to look like a New England cottage.

Everything about Clare Bridge of Perinton, a state-licensed adult home for people with Alzheimer’s disease and other memory disorders, seemed top-notch. From private bedrooms to an outdoor courtyard, the place looked immaculate. A 24-hour staff was there to help Littrell’s mother overcome declining skills that left her unable to eat, dress and bathe herself.

But that feeling of trust shattered on April 10 when police arrested a 21-year-old employee, Jesus Gonzalez, for attempted sexual abuse of an elderly Alzheimer’s patient so feeble that she couldn’t speak or move without assistance.

That was just the beginning. The state Health Department, which swooped in days after the arrest, then issued in a scathing report outlining how Clare Bridge had hidden previous abuse allegations involving Gonzalez, some of which were documented by his supervisors last year.

’’The more that comes out about this place, the more horrifying it becomes,’’ said Littrell, who moved her mother to a new home after Gonzalez’s arrest.

Two months later, Littrell and other family members still seek to learn why Clare Bridge kept Gonzalez around when his supervisors allegedly knew there were warning signs about his behavior that jeopardized the safety of all 52 residents.

The results of an investigation by the Democrat and Chronicle, encompassing interviews with more than a dozen clients and former employees at Clare Bridge, show that favoritism and a culture of hands-off management may have played a role.

Clare Bridge, which is owned by Milwaukee-based Alterra Health Care Corp., caught Gonzalez making calls to ‘’900’’ numbers -- believed to be sex lines and psychic services -- from residents’ bedrooms last year, according to the state.

Instead of firing Gonzalez, who has ties to management, Alterra paid the $1,750 bill and kept Gonzalez on the payroll, perhaps to garnish his wages as payback, former employees tell the Democrat and Chronicle.

The unfolding story may only get worse. The state Health Department continues to investigate the matter, and Gonzalez -- who is charged with attempted first-degree sexual abuse, a class E felony -- may face additional charges, said Leanne Moser, assistant district attorney for Monroe County.

About 44 residents remain at Clare Bridge; at least six others, including Littrell’s mother, have been moved to new adult homes by their guardians, who wait for answers to some crucial questions: How many more dementia residents -- many of whom either cannot talk or lack the cognitive skills to speak intelligibly -- may have been abused? What motivated management to protect this allegedly dangerous employee? Did the parent company know about the situation? And moreover, how was the state Health Department, the agency in charge of regulating patient safety at adult homes, so easily misled?

Money troubles

Alterra Health Care Corp. is one of the largest operators of assisted-living facilities and memory care homes in the nation. But it has a checkered past.

In the late 1990s, many companies like Alterra made big profits as elderly people and their families, eager to avoid nursing homes, flocked to assisted-living centers and memory care facilities. Alterra charges between $4,800 and $5,200 a month for room and board -- all of it private pay.

But according to industry observers, Alterra’s expansion exceeded demand, leaving it with mounting debt and tumbling stock prices. The company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in January.

As part of its bankruptcy recovery plan, Alterra has been selling off adult homes across the country, including a memory care home in the Rochester suburb of Greece. Alterra now operates 379 homes in 24 states, down from about 490 last year.

Fifteen Alterra-owned homes remain in New York; Clare Bridge of Perinton is the only one in the Rochester area.

Although the company has received high marks from patient advocates in many states, questionable practices have been documented in at least five others.

Many of these problems, such as medication errors and constant staff turnover, may be emblematic of a broader industry issue -- labor turmoil in an industry that prizes low-paid, unskilled workers -- but others are extreme.

A trial is expected to begin this month in suburban Philadelphia, where four former employees at an Alterra facility there are charged in the beating death of an 83-year-old Alzheimer’s resident.

Industry observers question whether for-profit companies such as Alterra, which pay between $8.50 and $10 an hour for unskilled workers, always act in the best interest of patient care.

’’Clearly, there is a cultural problem with publicly traded companies that operate adult homes,’’ said Marvin LeRoy Jr., director of the Coalition of New York State Alzheimer’s Association Chapters. ‘’The corporate culture is always money. That is your only concern at the board table.’’

Still, the overall quality of care at adult homes largely comes down to having good local management, LeRoy said. Good local managers, even if their facilities are short-staffed, can make the best of tough situations.

Who was in charge?

At Clare Bridge of Perinton, that job fell to building administrator Charlene Englerth, who was promoted to that position in late 2001. Previously, Englerth had been the home’s activities director, scheduling in-house concerts and various programs for the residents.

Some clients say that Englerth, 50, was in over her head -- that she wasn’t qualified for the job and that she couldn’t control her staff, allowing them to go unpunished for medication errors and for not showing up for work.

’’People were shocked that she ended up being the director,’’ said Jennifer Merlo of North Chili, a former aide at Clare Bridge who left in 2002 because of what she called an unprofessional atmosphere. ‘’I think it just happened because she was there and no one else was around to fill the position.’’

The state Health Department, however, certified Englerth in February 2002, saying she met the requirements: A high school diploma, or an equivalent; at least two years of supervisory experience; and the completion of state-credited training courses.

’’Charlene always impressed me as a caring person. That’s why it’s so hard to believe that she was involved with this coverup,’’ said Littrell, who added that she does not suspect that her mother was abused at Clare Bridge.

Englerth did not return calls seeking comment.

As for Gonzalez, he is described by Littrell and others as polite, charming and mostly soft-spoken. He had endear-ed himself to many family members.

Gonzalez, who declined to be interviewed for this article, lives in Rochester with his girlfriend and their two young children. Until his arrest, he had been assigned to work the daytime shift at Clare Bridge.

’’I made a huge effort to be there every week and to get to know the people who were taking care of my mother,’’ said Littrell, whose mother lived there two years. ‘’I felt I knew the place, but clearly I did not.’’

According to the state Health Department’s unfolding investigation, Englerth and case manager Geri Thurston knew that Gonzalez posed a threat to residents in 2002 and did everything they could to prevent others from knowing about it.

At the start of that year, Gonzalez was caught calling the 900 phone numbers.

In June, a co-worker found Gonzalez in the bedroom of an elderly woman, his pants undone and the woman half-naked. Englerth and Thurston documented the incident, but never reported it to the state. They also threatened to fire any employee who might reveal this information to inspectors, according to the state.

’’Charlene said to us: ‘The subject is dropped,’ ‘’ said a former employee who was there last year and spoke to the Democrat and Chronicle on the condition that her name not be used.

Then in November, the state Health Department received an anonymous tip that Gonzalez was abusing a resident. Investigators immediately swarmed the facility, but Gonzalez and Englerth were nowhere to be found, the state says. When investigators turned to Thurston, she denied any knowledge of the allegation. Other rank-and-file employees -- mindful of management’s threat -- told the same lie.

’’If this is true, then this is one of the most outrageous things I’ve ever heard,’’ said Cynthia Rudder, executive director of the Nursing Home Community Coalition of New York State.

Thurston could not be reached for comment.

What Alterra knew

It is unclear from the state’s report whether Englerth and Thurston also kept Alterra in the dark. From its headquarters in Milwaukee, the company has not publicly stated whether it had prior knowledge of Gonzalez’s behavior.

Alterra is also silent about its handling of the three key players: Gonzalez has been fired, but Englerth and Thurston have only been suspended and the company won’t say for how long. Jane Kirby, a regional manager for Alterra, is temporarily in charge.

A bigger mystery is what may have motivated these two high-level managers to keep Gonzalez on the payroll and protect him from outside scrutiny.

Former employees told the Democrat and Chronicle that favoritism may have been a factor. Gonzalez’s live-in girlfriend also worked at Clare Bridge, along with her mother and other family members. All were said to be good friends with Englerth and Thurston. The group formed a tight circle.

Officials at Alterra declined to be interviewed for this article. Instead, the company issued a short statement.

’’It is Alterra’s practice and desire to keep our families informed of matters as it relates to their loved ones,’’ the statement says. ‘’We continually balance this communication process with the requirement of resident confidentiality. Likewise, it is our practice not to discuss confidential employment-related matters.

’’We can assure you, however, that when we learned of the incident, we immediately notified the police, the state Health Department and the family of the resident involved. We cooperated fully with the authorities and continue to do so.’’


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us