Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 

Support Global Action on Aging!

Thanks!

An Assist for The Elderly

By Henry L. Davis, Buffalo News

 May 19, 2003

Elaine Clark, a resident of the Weinberg apartments: "I have no complaint with the nursing home, but it wasn't for me. I felt as though I was sinking into oblivion."

A nursing home is a rough compromise at the end of life.

Even in the better facilities, older people give up the comforts of home to share small rooms with strangers and strict schedules.

Others have it worse.

They're trapped in places where shoddy care slowly strips them of health and dignity. Call bells go unanswered. The bedridden lie in urine. Pressure sores grow out of control.

Now, as the United States faces an explosion in the number of frail seniors and the cost of housing them, a dramatically different alternative to the nursing home is starting to take hold. The goal is radical in an industry based on bricks and mortar:

Do the opposite of institutionalizing the elderly.

Instead, keep people in their own homes for as long as possible and coordinate all of their services - from doctor visits to meals to physical therapy.

It's a fledgling approach centered around adult day care that exists in a few cities around the country and now in Buffalo.

Weinberg Campus in Getzville, a senior community that includes apartments, assisted-living units and a nursing home, recently started offering this new service for low-income seniors.

If successful, the movement away from institutional care may revolutionize the way the nation treats its elderly and contain soaring costs.

"The financial interests of nursing homes conflict with the interests of residents, because the sicker a person is, the more money the institution gets. For the first time, this program gives us an incentive to keep people well and at home," said David Dunkelman, president of Weinberg Campus.

Nationally, the strategy is referred to as the Program for All-inclusive Care for the Elderly, or PACE for short. Weinberg Campus calls it Total Aging in Place.

The emphasis is on prevention. PACE rolls into one package home care, medical care, activities, meals, social work, therapy and transportation, as well as hospital and nursing home care if needed. It is a solution to a problem anyone with aging parents knows well - that services for senior citizens in the United States are costly, uncoordinated and of inconsistent quality. Moreover, families that want to care for an aging relative at home can't find much help.

"Nursing homes are appropriate for some people. But we're trying to squeeze quality out of a dinosaur. You can't be creative because of the rigidity of the rules," said Shawn Bloom, president of the National PACE Association in Alexandria, Va.

In the apartments

Although some participants in Weinberg's program will live in the community and be transported to a new day care center, the organization also built a 120-unit apartment building for enrollees. The $10.5 million facilities sit across the road from the campus.

Elaine Clark moved into the apartments from a nursing home and reflects another aspect of the country's long-term care crisis: Many nursing home residents don't need such a high level of care but have no other option.

A diabetic whose kidneys eventually failed, Clark is 59. She was too ill to care for herself, so she moved in with a 90-year-old aunt in North Tonawanda. She received a kidney transplant in 2001 and then was transferred to a nursing home. After she recuperated, she couldn't leave.

Clark was too frail to live alone and could no longer rely on her aunt. Her children were young and lived out of town. Assisted-living facilities were too expensive.

"I have no complaint with the nursing home, but it wasn't for me. I felt as though I was sinking into oblivion," she said. "You share a little room with a curtain between you and the other person. People walk in without knocking. Everything happens on their schedule."

Now she lives in one of the new apartments, a small but comfortable unit that overlooks a grove of trees. She can e-mail family from a computer near her bed. There are photographs on the wall and books on the shelves. Three days a week, she uses a walker to visit the day care center, where she sees the medical staff, eats lunch, takes cooking classes and schmoozes with other PACE enrollees.

The new buildings were designed with the disabled in mind. The sidewalk in front of the day care center is heated to melt snow. Huge windows provide abundant sunlight. To prevent falls and depression, sensors in the apartments automatically turn on a light when the natural light dims. Refrigerators are raised off the floor so individuals don't have to bend.

"Independence is important to me, and I feel as though I have a part of my life back," Clark said.

From California

The philosophy of PACE was pioneered in the early 1970s by On Lok Senior Health Services in San Francisco's Chinatown.

Asian families wanted their elderly members to live at home instead of nursing facilities. On Lok, which means "peaceful, happy abode" in Cantonese, opened the nation's first adult day care that offered an array of services.

On Lok caught the attention of the federal government, which in 1986 allowed 10 organizations to replicate it. In 1997, Congress gave PACE "permanent provider status" under Medicare and made it a state option under Medicaid, enabling programs to grow. PACE now serves 10,000 people in 20 states.

Although there's no guarantee PACE will flourish, it's one of the few signs of hopeful change in a long-term-care industry that faces serious problems, say Bloom and others in elder care.

The country is rapidly aging. The number of people ages 65 and older is expected to increase from about 35 million in 2000 to 71 million in 2030, and the number of people 80 and older is expected to increase from 9.3 million to 19.5 million, according to the Census Bureau.

Already, this region has one of the highest shares of older people in the nation. Nearly 16 percent of Erie and Niagara counties' residents are 65 or older, the 10th-highest ranking among large metropolitan areas.

People are not just living longer. Because of advances in medicine, fewer Americans are dying from acute diseases than in the past. Today, such chronic conditions as heart disease, asthma, arthritis and diabetes are major causes of disability and death in the United States.

Experts say many of these aging people neither belong in nursing homes nor want them. The nation can't afford to build more facilities anyway.

"The problem with nursing homes is not that people who run them are evil. It's that no species has ever had individuals walking around in their 90s and 100s," Dunkelman said. "We're still learning what to do with them."

Traditional is costly

Taxpayers spend extraordinary sums to care for the aged in hospitals and nursing homes.

That's because Medicare, the federal health plan for seniors, and Medicaid, the state-federal health plan for the poor that also pays nursing home care, provide coverage mainly for acute illness.

Not only has the health system not changed to help chronically ill people live at home, but the services they now receive lack coordination. Patients can go from home to a hospital to a nursing home and back to a hospital again, with little communication among the nurses, therapists and doctors involved in their care.

Donna Hanzel used to work as a nutrition consultant and recalls her sense of desperation as she tried to manage something as simple as a diet for elderly clients who bounced from one institution to another.

She's now executive director of the 5-year-old PACE program in Syracuse and sees a startling difference.

"Everyone - the doctor, the therapists, the dietitians - is on one team, sitting around one table and talking about the people we care for," she said.

What sets PACE apart is that Medicaid and Medicare are combined into a set per-person fee that guarantees the government some savings. The government then contracts with an organization, such as Weinberg Campus, to provide services to individuals who qualify for the program.

New care in small groups

PACE programs are small - 150 to 400 people per site. And they are usually anchored by an adult day care center that offers activities, meals and therapies.

A physician oversees basic medical care. PACE pays for all medications. It coordinates home health and social services, as well as hospital and nursing home care if necessary. A team of people, from the medical director to the van driver, is supposed to meet daily to check on enrollees.

To qualify, a person must be 55 or older, certified to need nursing home care, able to live safely in the community with help from the program and eligible for Medicaid or willing to pay out of pocket. Similar to an HMO, participants must use the program's network of doctors.

"In a nursing home, everyone gets every service. It's to the point where care is based on regulation, not on what a person needs. I can target money more appropriately. If someone doesn't need physical therapy, I don't have to provide it," said Randi Dressel, administrator of the Total Aging in Place Program.

Dressel is convinced more grown children will help parents live independently if they receive help from such programs.

Facing challenges

Supporters believe PACE reflects the type of holistic and humane care people would prefer in their final days, but it faces major challenges.

Organizations must spend millions of dollars to start a program and then take on the financial risk of caring for frail seniors at a set rate. As a hedge against losing money, Weinberg Campus built the apartments so enrollment would grow quickly.

To succeed, the programs must attract individuals before they become seriously ill. But relatively healthy people may refuse to attend a day care center and use a limited group of doctors.

Most importantly, PACE pays only for the poor. It's not clear whether, when or how the program will reach the middle class.

"PACE is a great idea, but it's still a boutique service for a small population," said Robyn Stone, executive director of the Institute for the Future of Aging Services in Washington, D.C.

"Can it reach a broader audience? Can it be more affordable to those who pay privately?" she asked. "The potential is great, but changing the way we pay for long-term care isn't on the government's radar screen."


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us