Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 DonateNow

Seniors give frozen meals chilly reception

 By Kathy Mellott 

Tribune –Democrat, August 21, 2003 

 

BEDFORD – Ora Smith shuffles around her tiny kitchen taking soup from the cupboard and tuna from the fridge.
Yesterday, this was her lunch – and dinner.
She paused to recall the way her noon meal used to be before Bedford County Area Agency on Aging switched from hot meals, delivered daily, to frozen meals delivered once a week to last for seven days.
Now, she will have no fresh fruit, no vegetables, cooked or raw, no fruit juice. Dessert will be some canned applesauce stashed in the refrigerator.
Frozen meals have been used in Somerset County for the past several years. But Cambria County has been able to maintain its daily hot meal delivery, said Commissioner Kathy Holtzman.
“Those meals when they served them, they were good. You got fresh fruit,” Smith said in an interview at her tiny home off Milk and Water Road, Everett.
“Those frozen meals didn’t taste right, but then I miss the drivers that brought them too,” she said.
Smith, 76, childless and widowed for 24 years, laments a June change that replaced the meals cooked and delivered daily to her and other seniors. Delivered meals go to those in the county who meet income guidelines and can’t cook for themselves.
The change is saving the cash-strapped aging agency more than $70,000 annually, largely in gasoline. That’s little comfort to Smith, who tried the frozen meals the first week before dropping out.
Volunteers are the key to daily deliveries.
“When they are being brought into the home, you get a lot of volunteers involved,” Holtzman said in a telephone interview from her Ebensburg office.
“Many times that person delivering the meal is the only person these people see.”
Smith mustered her courage and reregistered a few weeks ago in the program designed for the homebound.
Again Smith canceled the meals, which are delivered without charge to qualifying seniors.
The ideal way to prepare the frozen meals is in a microwave, but the wiring in Smith’s house, a one-time hunting cabin, is so antiquated it can’t handle the load, she said.
Heating the meal in a conventional oven results in noodles and other parts of the meal that are rendered inedible, she said.
But many people who have a microwave are finding the frozen meals similarly unacceptable, said Edna Showalter, Everett Senior Center director.
Prior to the change to frozen, 32 seniors in the Everett area received the meals. That figure has plummeted to 11, Showalter said at an interview at the center.
The more than 40 who took the home-delivered meals in Bedford has been cut in half, officials at that center said.
The dropout figures in Everett and Bedford do not reflect on the new meals, said R. Alan Smith, executive director of the aging agency, which also covers Huntingdon and Fulton counties. He’s no relation to Ora Smith.
“It’s gone down and it’s going back up,” Mr. Smith said of the 5,059 meals delivered to seniors in the three counties during December, and the 4,514 reported in July.
“We’re asking people to remain active in a small part. We’re saying, ‘Put this in the microwave,’ ” he said in a telephone interview from his office.
Few complaints have been voiced about the frozen meal program in the southern end of Bedford County, said Del Biller, mayor of Hyndman and a member of the agency’s Citizens Advisory Council.
“One of the complaints is that the delivery guys had fellowship with the people when they delivered the meals and they don’t have that now,” Biller said in a telephone interview from his home.
Some of the homebound also have complained about the lack of fresh fruit in the daily frozen meals, Biller said.
The clamor from seniors in Bedford and Everett prompted Commissioner Dick Rice to get involved.
His analysis this week after preparing and eating one of the frozen meals is that it was “not that bad.”
In a written critique to the agency, Rice, 72, an advocate for county seniors, said his biggest concern is with instructions that call for a heating time of four to six minutes. Rice said it took nine minutes to get his meal of roast beef, mashed potatoes and corn to a suitable temperature.
He also thinks the frozen meals do not contain as much food as the hot meals.
Steps are being taken to provide instructions that are easier for seniors to understand, Mr. Smith said.
Regardless of what’s done, change was necessary to reduce costs, Biller said.
“The budget has been cut, something has to give and this is one way of keeping the budget in line,” he said.
In a county with few volunteers, the cost of delivering the meals runs $1.10 per mile. The switch to the frozen meals reduced the mileage by 6,000 miles per month, Mr. Smith said.
The cost of the frozen meals, prepared under contract by Pittsburgh Companies Inc. of Butler, is slightly higher at $2.79 each as compared to $2.65 for a hot meal, but the few extra pennies is well worth the net savings, officials said.

That $70,000 goes a long way toward making up funding cuts including a loss of $42,000 from the state’s Human Services Development Fund, Mr. Smith said.
The money the agency received from the state’s share of national tobacco settlement was used for two years to fund the home-delivered meals program, he said. The money has been used up.


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us