Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 

Want to support Global Action on Aging?

Click below:

Thanks!

State must stick to settlement promising in-home care for the elderly

The Associated Press, Sarasota Herald-Tribune

 September 4, 2003

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — The state cannot modify a settlement agreement that guarantees in-home personal care services to elderly residents who otherwise would be forced to live in nursing homes, a federal judge ruled.

The program to provide so-called "personal care attendants" to the elderly is required by a federal legal settlement, but it targets some of the same Medicaid dollars on which the nursing homes depend. The suit, filed by the New-Orleans based Advocacy Center in 2000, alleges lack of home- and community- based care options for Louisiana's elderly and disabled.

"We have people who desperately need these services," Advocacy Center attorney Nell Hahn told U.S. District Judge Kurt Engelhardt during the hearing. "This is a real service that we bargained for."

The state Department of Health and Hospitals requested $38 million to implement the Medicaid program, but the Legislature balked at approving it as a required state Medicaid service open to all who qualify. Lawmakers said they feared an uncapped personal-care program would put financial strains on the state budget.

The program was slated to begin July 1, but the Legislature voted to delay that start by three months and instead provided $28 million to expand a variety of home- and community-based services.

It also directed DHH to go back to federal court to see if it could scale back the program, capping the number of people who could get services.

DHH attorney Rick Henley told Engelhardt the new plan would serve more people and offer more options for help than the personal-care attendant program, and he asked the judge to "give deference to the preferences of the Legislature."

"The state of Louisiana speaks through its legislators, and the legislators have spoken," Henley said.

Hahn countered that nursing-home interests, who claim the costs of a full-blown personal-care attendant program would result in underfunding of nursing homes, convinced the Legislature to seek a modification of the program.

"The Legislature has not refused to fund this program," she said. "We are not dealing here with a legislative refusal. We're dealing with a request for modification. This court is not free to modify."

The judge agreed with Hahn, but denied the plaintiffs' request that he order the state to comply with the personal-care attendant option.

"We suggest they're dragging their feet," Hahn argued. "We want this done quickly and expeditiously."

But the judge said the state defendants are not in breach of the settlement agreement.

DHH Secretary David Hood said he was disappointed, but not surprised, by the court's decision.

"We're going to comply with the court order, and we're also going to review this with the Legislature at the first opportunity," Hood said.

The health department estimates that 1,700 people who are at "imminent risk" of being placed in a nursing home would be eligible for the program, which could begin as early as Oct. 1. That doesn't include current nursing-home residents who might opt for home care if it's available.


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us