Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 

Proposed Medicare cuts may limit chemotherapy

By Kim Norris, Detroit Free Press
October 21, 2003

 

Potentially significant cuts to federal reimbursements for chemotherapy drugs have some cancer doctors threatening to stop administering the life-saving medicines in their offices.

Proposals in House and Senate versions of pending Medicare drug legislation are targeting the reimbursements Medicare pays doctors for close to 100 chemotherapy drugs.

The legislation could cut up to $16 billion of Medicare funding for cancer care over the next 10 years, according to Congressional Budget Office estimates.

In Michigan , a state with a comparatively large number of Medicare beneficiaries, that translates to $280 million over the next 10 years. That would make it the eighth-hardest-hit state in the country. And while the future of the legislation is unclear, Medicare separately is proposing a couple of rule changes that immediately would cut reimbursements for chemo drugs by as much as $27.6 billion.

Cancer doctors, who depend on the drug reimbursements to offset the insufficient payments for administering the medicines, say reducing the rates could discourage them from giving treatments in their private practices. Patients would have to go to hospitals for their chemo treatments.

"This system of community care will cease to exist if these cuts go through," said Dr. David Decker, director of Cancer Care Associates, a private oncology practice that employs 60 people on the campus of Beaumont Hospital in Royal Oak .

Cancer Care Associates hosted a media event Monday to highlight the consequences the cuts would cause if they go through.

Decker cited an American Society of Clinical Oncology survey. It indicated 70 percent of private-practice doctors said they would cease to give chemotherapy in their offices if drug reimbursements were cut.

"Care of these patients will shift to hospital systems, which already are overburdened," Decker said.

Ilene Wolfe, spokeswoman for Beaumont , said the hospital would be able to absorb the 8,000 annual visits to Cancer Care Associates.

"We're not here to take business away from them, but we will provide care to the patients if they no longer can," she said.

Under Medicare, the federally funded health insurance for 40 million seniors and disabled Americans, hospitals and doctors are reimbursed differently for outpatient services.

At issue are proposals by Medicare that call for reducing reimbursements to oncologists while increasing the reimbursements for administrative costs. Drug rates and fees are adjusted annually.

This time, the drug adjustment and fee adjustment are being presented jointly to reflect where costs are incurred, said a spokeswoman for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid.

She said the net result to onocolgists is probably going to be a decrease. "We won't increase the payment rate as much as we take out of medication," the spokeswoman said.

Under the practice-expense increase, Medicare payments to doctors for the administration of drugs are expected to increase $1.6 billion over next 10 years. At the same time reimbursements for drugs are likely to be cut anywhere from $4.1 billion to $27.6 billion -- depending on which of four proposed rules is adopted. That could represent a savings of $2.6 billion to $17.6 billion to beneficiaries, who pay 20 percent of the cost of all Medicare drugs and services.

"Everyone agrees that doctors are overpaid for drugs . . . significantly more than their costs, because of the way the costs have been determined in the past," the spokeswoman said.

"Our goal is to pay appropriately," she said. "When we overpay for a service or drug, the beneficiary overpays."


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us