Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 

Elderly in line to get bone drug subsidy

 

By Julie Robotham, the Morning Herald
October 20, 2003

Thousands more elderly people could qualify for subsidised drugs to treat the bone-thinning disorder osteoporosis under a new push.

Advocacy group Osteoporosis Australia wants drugs subsidised for preventing fractures. At present, drugs such as Fosamax and Evista are subsidised under the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) only to people who have had a fracture attributed to osteoporosis.

The group's chief executive, Judy Stenmark, said the drugs would be most beneficial before a person sustained such an injury, which could have long-term effects on their mobility and health.

Ms Stenmark said all men and women aged over 65 should be able to have a Medicare-funded test to establish their bone mineral density if their doctor recommended them for such a test.

Given their age and the test result, some should then qualify for subsidised access to the drugs, which otherwise cost about $70 for one month's treatment.

The chairman of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, Lloyd Sansom, said the committee acknowledged "intuitively" that it would be better to prevent bone loss from progressing to disabling injury.

The committee, which recommends which drugs the Federal Government should subsidise, now only had to be convinced about what criteria should make a person eligible for an ordinary subsidised script at $23.10, or $3.70 for a pensioner.

He suggested some combination of low bone density and older age would be an appropriate way of determining who should receive the drugs, which can cut fracture risk by half within three to six months of first using them. Younger people would probably not qualify even if their bone density was low, because they were not at risk of injury from falls.

Professor Sansom said the drugs' manufacturers would have to show they were cost-effective for prevention of a first fracture.

It was relatively easy to demonstrate the benefit of treating people with a previous fracture because they were at substantially greater risk of breaking more bones, he said. But it was harder to determine what degree of bone-thinning warranted treatment in someone who had not had a fracture.

Professor Sansom said the committee would meet specialist doctors in November to try to come up with a formula.

The committee rejected an application for PBS listing by Merck Sharp & Dohme, the maker of Fosamax, because it was not satisfied that the economic benefits projected by the company would materialise. The company said it would continue to negotiate with the government for a wider PBS listing.

Rheumatologist Professor Philip Sambrook, of the University of Sydney , said subsidising the drugs would not add massive costs to the PBS, because only 5 per cent of elderly people were at high risk of the disease, and not all would want treatment.

The disease is estimated to affect up to two million people and to cost $7 billion annually in treatment and indirect costs.

 


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us