|
Robbing the Elderly Won't Pay the Government's
Rising Care Bills
By Jeremy Warner, Telegraph UK
July
10, 2012
Photo: Alamy/ In TV debates before the last
election, David Cameron pledged to maintain
universal pensioner benefits; to reverse that
promise now would be close to political
suicide
If you are a pensioner, or soon to
become one, batten down the hatches, for with the
public finances strained to breaking point, your tax
breaks and entitlements are about to come under
sustained siege.
This might seem an odd thing to say on the day the
Government is expected to accept, in principle at
least, the Dilnot proposals to cap the amounts older
people are expected to pay towards their care. But the
costs of this concession, assuming it ever gets
introduced, and the multitude of other fast-growing
liabilities associated with an ageing population, have
to be funded somehow. All the signs are that the
Government will eventually end up trying to plug the
gap by taxing pensioners more, and via what in essence
amounts to the same thing – means-testing some
entitlements. What the state gives with one hand, it
will take away with the other.
In a speech to the Resolution Foundation yesterday,
Nick Boles, an influential Tory backbencher, suggested
just that: free bus passes, free TV licences and
winter fuel allowances should go for better-off
pensioners. By raising this prospect, he is stirring
up a political hornets’ nest. Just the relatively
innocuous removal of a pensioner tax perk in the last
Budget – the so-called granny tax – caused a storm of
protest, helping to cement the perception of a
Chancellor hopelessly out of touch with ordinary
concerns. What’s more, in TV debates before the last
election, David Cameron pledged to maintain universal
pensioner benefits; to reverse that promise now would
be close to political suicide. Yet whoever wins the
next election is going to have to confront these
issues somehow.
Lack of growth has pushed the planned deficit
reduction programme well into the next parliament,
with a further £10 billion of additional,
unspecified welfare cuts still to come after 2015.
Analysis by the Office for Budget Responsibility shows
the longer-term outlook to be grimmer still. In the
absence of big changes in public policy, the OBR says,
the Government would be forced to spend ever more as a
proportion of national income on age-related items
such as pensions and health care, with little rise in
government revenues to compensate.
Having struggled to get on top of Gordon Brown’s
disastrous legacy of overspending, future governments
face a groundswell of separate, age-related pressures
which, left unaddressed, would ratchet up the national
debt to well in excess of 100 per cent of GDP in 50
years’ time. In a reductio ad absurdum, Barnet council
has produced a “graph of doom” which shows that, such
are the demographic pressures, within 20 years the
London borough will be unable to fund any services
outside adult social care and children’s services – no
libraries, no parks, no leisure facilities. Even bin
collections would go.
|
|