Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    







 

 

 

 UN Open-Ended Working Group on Ageing Daily Summary - 1

By Bethany Brown

August 1, 2011


2nd Session of the UN Open-ended Working Group on Ageing

The Morning Session


Member states and civil society were invited to make opening statements. The Chair repeated the intention of the Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) to facilitate a dialogue.  Many states were present but did not make statements. Few expressed indecision.  Most statements were in favor of or against a legally-binding instrument to protect the human rights of older persons.  States from Latin America and the Caribbean spoke strongly and eloquently in favor of a legally-binding instrument. The delegation from Brazil in particular brought a distinguished team of experts, including a member of the Human Rights Commission for Brazil’s government.

Some member states spoke against a legally-binding instrument, expressing that dialogue alone could strengthen the human rights of older persons.  Many states made implicit or explicit reference to the resource-intense process of a new convention. The EU noted that every treaty body should attend to the rights of older persons under the equality and nondiscrimination provisions of international human rights law.  While these provisions were discussed at length during the April OEWG, no consensus of normative protection yet exists.

To build consensus and a more robust dialogue, more needs to be heard from Asian and African states.  Japan highlighted population ageing within its own borders, but it exists across the whole world.  African states can be proud that life expectancy at age 65 rivals that of many of the countries of Latin America and Europe.  Older people may be particularly marginalized where populations appear very young when measured by a national average age. Consultations are still ongoing for the election of an African region Bureau member.

Representatives from civil society gave short presentations, including a representative from an organization in Cameroon.  Many noted ageist attitudes families, the workplace, and communities are rife and often accepted.  These have cumulative effects on older people and their empowerment to exercise their rights.  Ken Bluestone spoke on behalf of the newly-formed Global Alliance, providing a short introduction for its work.

A Special Rapporteur.  Notably throughout the morning, specific reference to the possibility of a Special Rapporteur was included in many statements, whether supportive of a legally binding instrument or not.  The United States included a Special Rapporteur in its incremental approach, suggesting a range of options with efforts and attention first put toward the 10-year review of the Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing (MIPAA), next exploring a Special Rapporteur, and finally, exploration of the potential for a legally-binding instrument.

The Afternoon Session


In the afternoon, a panel of experts spoke about discrimination against older persons.  Panelists discussed the dire problems of many older people in South Africa, and the lives of older people in Afghanistan.  They further explored concepts for a legal framework around discrimination against older persons, and provided a summation of the findings of the work of the first OEWG with regard to legal gaps.  Few explicit references to age discrimination exist at all, and focus is often narrowly on specific subsets of older persons, such as women or those with disabilities.

Normative Gaps. Little discussion was based around the normative gaps that exist from state to state.  Consensus around the legal definition of discrimination is clear.  What is less clear, based on the discussion from the floor in the afternoon session, is whether states are willing to recognize what discrimination gaps exist in practice. Jurists in member states will only analyze equality and nondiscrimination if they can identify that a prohibited form is at issue.  Civil society can seize the opportunity to shine a light on the normative gaps existing as discrimination in the identified discussion topics this week, supplying the facts and real-life experiences of older people.

Submitted by
Bethany Brown, JD*
Policy and Advocacy Fellow, HelpAge USA
*New York Bar Admission Pending

 

 

        

 


Copyright © 2004 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us