Home |  Elder Rights |  Health |  Pension Watch |  Rural Aging |  Armed Conflict |  Aging Watch at the UN  

  SEARCH SUBSCRIBE  
 

Mission  |  Contact Us  |  Internships  |    

 



back

 

Seniors often drugged illegally, lawyers say
Common at nursing homes and hospitals, legal clinic suggests

By Helen Henderson, The Toronto Star
October 24, 2003

Mind-altering drugs pose risk to elderly due to altered met

Nursing homes and hospitals routinely use mind-altering drugs to subdue elderly patients without getting the required consent for treatment, a group of Ontario lawyers says.

"Treatment without consent seems to be a common practice in nursing homes and hospitals, especially with respect to drug treatments for older adults with some degree of cognitive impairment," the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly says in its latest newsletter.

The centre, a legal clinic for low-income seniors, says several families have made formal complaints on the issue to the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario.

"In every one of these cases, the (family) has felt that the physician's disregard for the patient's right not to receive treatment without consent was very harmful," writes lawyer Graham Webb.

Yet the college, a self-governing body that licenses and regulates doctors, has responded only with light penalties, essentially reminders of what the law requires, Webb says.

By law, doctors in Ontario must obtain informed consent for any treatment in cases that are not emergencies. In cases where a patient is not mentally capable of giving informed consent, the law says a substitute decision-maker, usually the person who holds power of attorney for personal care, must be appointed.

But Webb says the advocacy centre receives many calls from family members regarding the care of physically and/or cognitively impaired seniors. In cases where drug treatments turn out to be the root of the problem, many times mind-altering drugs have been administered "entirely without consent," he says. "The person taking the drugs may not be aware of doing so, and relatives and friends may have no knowledge of the drugs."

At a time when resources are short and staff pressed for time, "consent is one of the things that may get overlooked," says the advocacy centre's executive director Judith Wahl.

"We're not saying there's an intent to harm, but we do take the issue very seriously," Wahl says.

"Mind-altering neuroleptic medications are often given to make a nursing home resident or hospital patient more easily managed by staff," Webb says. "Sometimes these medications have little to do with the patient's medical condition and are simply a form of chemical restraint to alter behaviour.

"In some cases, these medications could have serious and long-lasting effects," he adds. "In one case, an expert coroner's geriatric committee reported that the medications administered without consent contributed to the patient's death."

The College of Physicians and Surgeons has a two-step complaints process. Issues raised by the public are first reviewed in private by the complaints committee. It may dismiss the charge or advise a doctor to correct certain practices. If it deems there is enough evidence, it refers the complaint to the discipline committee, which has the right to suspend or revoke a doctor's licence.

None of the treatment consent complaints made by the advocacy centre's clients has been referred to the disciplinary committee.

"Information only becomes public when it goes to the disciplinary committee," says Jill Hefley, spokesperson for the college.

"We can't comment on cases before the complaints committee," Hefley says, "but we do have fairly comprehensive policy on consent to treatment."

Among other things, the college advises that, while the law states that "consent to treatment may be express or implied, physicians are strongly advised to obtain express consent ... and to document the process of doing so."

But the Advocacy Centre for the Elderly says there is "a wide divergence" between the stated policy of the college and the light penalties meted out by its complaints committee.

Several times, the centre's clients have appealed decisions on consent issues to Ontario 's Health Services Appeal and Review Board.

In one case, the appeal board ruled that the complaints committee of the College of Physicians and Surgeons "did not properly consider the law of consent to treatment and directed that it reconsider the complaint," says Webb.

"The committee did reconsider the complaint without a hearing, but did not change its decision," Webb says.

The advocacy group says it hopes that "if more complaints are made to the college about this issue, the need for better education and understanding by both physicians and patients would be identified and acted on."

It stresses that mind-altering drugs pose serious risks to the elderly because age affects the way the body metabolizes drugs, making them more susceptible to "serious side-effects."


Copyright © 2002 Global Action on Aging
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy  |  Contact Us